Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Change-Id: I95381232eeefcd247a66a5cec370a8ce1c288e18
Issue-ID: SO-670
Signed-off-by: Benjamin, Max (mb388a) <mb388a@us.att.com>
|
|
This commit adds some robustness to the interface between the
API-H and BPMN, specifically, in how the response is handled.
I don't have proof, but there appears to be some randomness to
the json provider behavior when used with the jax-rs. Sometimes,
the serializer is adding the root element, and sometimes it
is not. Maybe there's something wrong with the configuration.
Maybe we have competing json providers. I couldn't pin this
down.
I'm almost certain it is the presence of the root element in
the content that causes the API-H code to fail parsing of the
BPMN response. This doesn't kill the request, as you might
expect, but rather, the API-H passes the BPMN response through
to the client (VID, or policy, or whatever).
The original problem (SO-586) was "fixed" by "removing the
wrapper". This "wrapper" is a needed feature of the interface
between BPMN and the API-H. We shouldn't have removed it.
The fact that the "fix" appeared to work is due to the
behavior I described in the previous paragraph. The API-H
chokes on the message, and it passes it through unchanged.
Not really what we want.
So, I don't know why the jackson/json behavior is flaky and
different now, but I can (and did) modify the API-H so it can
parse a json message whether or not it has a root element.
Note that WorkflowResponse.java (in BPMN) and CamundaResponse.java
(in the API-H) are basically the same bean representing the
message format. Seems less than ideal to have two different
classes.
Also note that I changed the name of the "response" attribute
of the WorkflowResponse and CamundaResponse classes to "content".
Got tired of seeing this nonsense everywhere in the code:
response.getResponse()
Change-Id: Icaf70f8457de99e493cf882170fe778c620308c9
Issue-ID: SO-586
Issue-ID: SO-618
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
This is code from AT&T's 1712 and 1802 releases.
Change-Id: Ie1e85851e94bc66c4d9514a0226c221939531a04
Issue-ID: SO-425
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I1e4ef70fbce846b9f5ea3527d534fc413fbda272
Issue-id: SO-224
Signed-off-by: Ramanjaneya-Huawei <ramanjaneya.palleti@huawei.com>
|
|
Issue-Id : SO-117
Change-Id: Icdc64605b475e20af7e871135af327f7d0e38792
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
This commit rebases changes from openecomp-mso/internal-staging-1710 up to and including this codecloud commit:
54483fc6606ddb1591a2e9da61bff8712325f924
Wed Sep 6 18:12:56 2017 -0400
Rebasing was done on a branch on top of this commit in so/master in ONAP:
93fbdfbe46104f8859d4754040f979cb7997c157
Thu Sep 7 16:42:59 2017 +0000
Change-Id: I4ad9abf40da32bf5bdca43e868b8fa2dbcd9dc59
Issue-id: SO-107
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|