Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This review collapses all the code in six podel submodules into a single
model module. There are no code changes, just files moved around.
This change reduces the complexity of the code structure and speeds up
the build.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1820
Change-Id: Ifb644e8ec85ae6d0987378f4616fbc8a8858a9a8
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
This review converst apex-pdp to use GSON for JSON handling. In order to
preserve backward compatibility with the JAXB format of JSON, custom
handling of maps was required. Therefore, the policy-common
StandardCoder could not be used.
There are a lot of small changes, removing annotations from concepts and
tweaking of test data. However, this cleans up the code base so it is
worth doing.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1820
Change-Id: I213fa64f6d7f3f1df8d10f111d9fbedbe80f9fe0
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
This review is part of a series of reviews to move the apex-pdp state
machine model to use the base model types in policy models.
Persistence of policies for apex-pdp is now implemented in PAP and API.
The historic direct load and save functionality for APEX policy state
machine models to and from databases is no longer used and no longer
supported.
This commit removes JPA annotations form apex-pdp code.
Subsequent reviews will mvoe the mdoel across to use the policy models
base model types.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1820
Change-Id: I91a45a0ca6c88f9ba4b201bad920065f95ffb31e
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
This review is part of a series of reviews to move the apex-pdp state
machine model to use the base model types in policy models.
Persistence of policies for apex-pdp is now implemented in PAP and API.
The historic direct load and save functionality for APEX policy state
machine models to and from databases is no longer used and no longer
supported.
This revmoves the DAO code from apex-pdp and the associated handling
and test code.
The next review will remove the JPA annotations.
Subsequent reviews will mvoe the mdoel across to use the policy models
base model types.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1820
Change-Id: Iabf034b40a413d32fe62091fe3446f52ec30d3af
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
In order to expose the processing status of a TOSCA policy
to APEX-PDP, a new header field for APEX concept "event"
has been introduced to track this within an APEX policy
implementation. This field will be leveraged to extract
the TOSCA policy execution metrics. Note, that the field is
marked as optional for backward compatibility.
Unit tests have been augmented to test for the field wherever
applicable and the default empty value is retained for the others.
"example-grpc" module has been updated to include this field.
Exposing the TOSCA policy execution metrics is outside the
scope of this patch since the current changes are already
very large owing to the atomic nature of the change introduced.
Issue-ID: POLICY-3845
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Pujar <rashmi.pujar1@bell.ca>
Change-Id: Ief6d70f9abcfc8414e10aa51a27815ee9028e4c8
|
|
*** This commit is generated by a PF release script ***
policy/apex-pdp is update from 2.7.0-SNAPSHOT to 2.7.1-SNAPSHOT
Issue-ID: POLICY-3827
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
Change-Id: I334dda447490f6c3e848be7b58f4a5119ae70ead
|
|
Change-Id: I8ead26be4968b94980dcafd269c7ab32022b34d0
Issue-ID: POLICY-3696
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: I0db6ab5efb0595cba86ce9cbaaafab88349818ff
Issue-ID: POLICY-3696
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie39d324e02a302b882318d46735a727322ce409d
Issue-ID: POLICY-3587
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Updated context to use lombok.
Issue-ID: POLICY-3391
Change-Id: I349e0202fffad161cac08cebaea4a9571db58bda
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
1) Remove the usage of inputField and outputField from Task definition.
2) Fix issues around populating events to task in case of State
Finalizer Logic.
Change-Id: Ief17f400729410b83c6b7c665980d443e0cf6f28
Issue-ID: POLICY-3336
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: I6b88d59a54617cb9f14a5aaa2638f87a6c1ef3e9
Issue-ID: POLICY-3209
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
This review addresses two main changes:
1) inputFields and outputFields are not tied to task definition anymore.
Instead inputEvent and outputEvents associated to a task is populated
as part of the policy state definition, as the state definition have
the information anyway.
- Clean up of the usage of inputFields and outputFields in task
definition will happen in a future review
- inputFields and outputFields defined in task definition in
policies until honolulu will not make the policy invalid as the
changes are done in backward compatible way.
2) Multiple output events can come out of a final state now.
- Define another policy state output with the relevant eventName in
the command file
- In the task logic, create a map to store the fields of the relevant
outputEvent, and then just call
"executor.addFieldsToOutput(<the_map_of_fields>)"
These 2 steps are enough to send multiple events to relevant
components as per the apex configuration.
Change-Id: Id88ca402704106404f529e595e1a76f6bf167876
Issue-ID: POLICY-3336
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-3209
Change-Id: I0cb6fc8f5693fe03b4d68af2fde5116e9e248115
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-3206
Change-Id: I3873c85aab577e85a9ae6b610c3871ee4de6ea53
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-3105
Change-Id: I53abd7e9cf8c1425d115b0bb917db6389e9ded92
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I291f968367b1f864bb417a72fd0bdb22a07ba0f7
Issue-ID: POLICY-3127
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: I761ded255a97128f858d3a7ce95f2479b6208a4e
Issue-ID: POLICY-3088
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Addressed the following issues:
- initialize mocks before use
- use parameterized queries
- Random() is not secure
- provide parameterized type for generics
- unused imports
- constructor visibility
- use compute() instead of containsKey()/put()
- make final fields static
- rename constants to all upper case
- no assert() in Thread.run() methods
- nested try
- nested if/else
- too many break/continue
- use try-with-resources
- repeatable annotations
- overlapping characters in reg ex
- hashcode is not sufficient in compareTo()
- need equals() with compareTo()
- make class an interface
- use parameterized test
- multiple calls in assert()
- log or re-throw
- use different type of lambda
- use parameterized logging
- use StringBuilder instead of concatenation
- use StandardCharsets.UTF_8
Issue-ID: POLICY-2906
Change-Id: I2cf8c885e3e22c2c6cbe6403a34906928afad022
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic4adf5bd8876dc31fc93993298e90389baaa2c39
Issue-ID: POLICY-2883
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2875
Change-Id: Ibb0e9a243bf92f0255cb5c145d31ccddb988fdf5
Signed-off-by: Ram Krishna Verma <ram_krishna.verma@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: I5e2cd92ee3620dea4070d9fa3aeb5ffd65f9412c
Issue-ID: POLICY-2869
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2839
Change-Id: Ia7c847b3dafd28958d5df209af95cac19fa480a0
Signed-off-by: Ram Krishna Verma <ram_krishna.verma@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: Idde5050b425eb1bebe312e80e795c21513367a1b
Issue-ID: POLICY-2789
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2654
Change-Id: Ifd391ea9141d37cfd3ca4110d66c667962230ae1
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Fix for assertions comparing dissimiliar types.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2761
Change-Id: I1b2b8afa3e6308cda887d73a4ee079709847d054
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
Replaced assertions to not have the same actual and expected expression
in apex-pdp
Issue-ID: POLICY-2761
Change-Id: I2bf45a3cc4411bd39f93f9d0b8c8e56dd318281e
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
Replace the type specification in this constructor call with the diamond operator
and other small fixes
Signed-off-by: JvD_Ericsson <jeff.van.dam@est.tech>
Issue-ID: POLICY-2760
Change-Id: I83821859a4a1dbbffbaeae15281abac2de3b5712
|
|
1) Do not stop all the marshallers/unmarshallers while updating the
engine. Stop and remove only those that are part of the policies that
are undeployed.
2) Do not reinitilaize any marshaller/unmarshaller that is already
initilaized as part of the policies which were already deployed.
Initialize only the ones as part of any newly deployed policy.
3) EngineParameters could be different in different policies. Aggregate
these parameters and make it available in the engine for any running policy.
4) Enable support for running policies with same model and different
configurations.
Change-Id: If74807a0515a741ef4e53bd0a93e43b05872f6b5
Issue-ID: POLICY-2536
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Change replaceAll() with repalce() in apex-pdp
Issue-ID: POLICY-2722
Signed-off-by: JvD_Ericsson <jeff.van.dam@est.tech>
Change-Id: I8a15b99f02399addfc8f0e25349e3022d8b8c9f1
|
|
|
|
Replace assertTrue with assertEquals and assertFalse with
assertNotEquals in apex-pdp/model
Issue-ID: POLICY-2690
Change-Id: Ifd435a4ea69d8f682407c2a70d5e8119f017ae9f
Signed-off-by: JvD_Ericsson <jeff.van.dam@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
Removed try/catch blocks in apex-pdp and replaced with assertj
assertions Part III
Issue-ID: POLICY-2451
Change-Id: I1e6ede1c256c5bcf7899e1af130add71fdf1381c
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
apex-pdp/testsuites
Replace assertTrue with assertEquals and assertFalse with
assertNotEquals in apex-pdp/model, apex-pdp/plugins, apex-pdp/services
and apex-pdp/testsuites
Issue-ID: POLICY-2690
Change-Id: If088371cf012d5648e04ade2aa4d49b38945f6d2
Signed-off-by: JvD_Ericsson <jeff.van.dam@est.tech>
|
|
Replace assertTrue with assertEquals and assertFalse with
assertNotEquals in apex-pdp/model
Issue-ID: POLICY-2690
Change-Id: Id37989ea8a6ad7b3156e13851cc072ce6c53c03e
Signed-off-by: JvD_Ericsson <jeff.van.dam@est.tech>
|
|
Removed try/catch blocks in apex-pdp with assertj assertions Part IV
Issue-ID: POLICY-2451
Change-Id: I4b6accb9f944195db9ccf8a5de165b169301ac7f
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
apex-pdp had an in-line docuemntation build system built on asciidoc. It
has proven to be very difficult to maintain and keep up to date and it
is incompatible with the ONAP official RST/ReadTheDocs docuementation
system.
In the Dublin release, we converted the asciidoc documentation to RST
format, and hae been updating the RST documentation since. The asciidoc
docuemntation system is now so out of date that it is being removed.
In this change, the "site" directory is removed from all modules in
apex-pdp and a profile called "apexSite" is removed from the pom.xml
file in all modules.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2686
Change-Id: I645f3ed101159d356cd90e619cef791067ad5eb5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2695
Change-Id: I15b489de9ca2614e3a6c94b450a3d6397d17d4ff
Signed-off-by: Ram Krishna Verma <ram_krishna.verma@bell.ca>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2188
Change-Id: I56bbf3aa3bd9e1ef433cc93ad2be0c54d141a2a5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2514
Change-Id: I764cfe41ed8cf8ffebd4ff076d0b76b79d61e142
Signed-off-by: RossC <ross.carter@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2514
Change-Id: I5b130b052150eb0e51759c751b83ab9d6f199759
Signed-off-by: RossC <ross.carter@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic668ab20498bdc41edc78f52c7ce9d89a1385f19
Issue-ID: POLICY-2378
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I59b93fccb0f3a41f8db753d1e8e2978bbb51e9a0
Issue-ID: POLICY-2378
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
This class was moved to policy-common some time ago. Removing it in
apex-pdp.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I982fbd799334b34f1526e19f339236b52205b91e
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
The laest Eclipse checkstyle version 8.26.0 does more thorough checking
and identified a number of small issues in the apex-pdp codebase. This
review fixes those issues.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I30ba25e3e425c6d54c77f925e8da3ab841a8357c
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Logging dialled back in logback.xml files and on ligging statements in
unit test java code.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2272
Change-Id: I3b9a46d8993b1571c8dc62687a9c136af46c1f51
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifaedc5074bcc51a5d495e342feae89b6a2aac1cf
Issue-ID: POLICY-1626
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Also added defaultbranch to the .gitreview file to make it easier
to change it when apex-pdp is branched in the future.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2045
Signed-off-by: jrh3 <jrh3@att.com>
Change-Id: Ib2570fd395aae38862299f2193b07ab06e32ace5
|