Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This is the final review in the refactoring of the model code in
apex-pdp.
The core-messaging and core-infrastructure modules are unused in
apex-pdp except for websocket communication. Websocket communication is
also not used in any deployment.
This review:
- removes the core-mesaging module, which had an apex-specific websocket
implementation, except for the MessageException class, which is moved
to the base core module
- removes the core-infrastructure module, except for the ThreadUtils
class, which is moved to the base core module
- removes the websocket event protocol, which used core-messaging but is
not used in any deployment
- collapses all three "core" submodules into a single module
- Updates dependencies where needed
Issue-ID: POLICY-1820
Change-Id: Ieae30063e99570e61943372d3fa23b77a211462c
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-3760
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Pujar <rashmi.pujar1@bell.ca>
Change-Id: I0fb59e8d9c95fd81a1754bb769705ef753b9022d
|
|
In order to expose the processing status of a TOSCA policy
to APEX-PDP, a new header field for APEX concept "event"
has been introduced to track this within an APEX policy
implementation. This field will be leveraged to extract
the TOSCA policy execution metrics. Note, that the field is
marked as optional for backward compatibility.
Unit tests have been augmented to test for the field wherever
applicable and the default empty value is retained for the others.
"example-grpc" module has been updated to include this field.
Exposing the TOSCA policy execution metrics is outside the
scope of this patch since the current changes are already
very large owing to the atomic nature of the change introduced.
Issue-ID: POLICY-3845
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Pujar <rashmi.pujar1@bell.ca>
Change-Id: Ief6d70f9abcfc8414e10aa51a27815ee9028e4c8
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-3846
Signed-off-by: Rashmi Pujar <rashmi.pujar1@bell.ca>
Change-Id: I385446683372548f3fed6d609a9e85633ec2916d
|
|
Also added lombok to test classes.
Issue-ID: POLICY-3391
Change-Id: I9ecf479f3861a2e5211b037e885029d1719b6a56
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
1) Remove the usage of inputField and outputField from Task definition.
2) Fix issues around populating events to task in case of State
Finalizer Logic.
Change-Id: Ief17f400729410b83c6b7c665980d443e0cf6f28
Issue-ID: POLICY-3336
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
This review addresses two main changes:
1) inputFields and outputFields are not tied to task definition anymore.
Instead inputEvent and outputEvents associated to a task is populated
as part of the policy state definition, as the state definition have
the information anyway.
- Clean up of the usage of inputFields and outputFields in task
definition will happen in a future review
- inputFields and outputFields defined in task definition in
policies until honolulu will not make the policy invalid as the
changes are done in backward compatible way.
2) Multiple output events can come out of a final state now.
- Define another policy state output with the relevant eventName in
the command file
- In the task logic, create a map to store the fields of the relevant
outputEvent, and then just call
"executor.addFieldsToOutput(<the_map_of_fields>)"
These 2 steps are enough to send multiple events to relevant
components as per the apex configuration.
Change-Id: Id88ca402704106404f529e595e1a76f6bf167876
Issue-ID: POLICY-3336
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Changes made into cli-codegen, cli-editor, and core-engine
Renamed one test class to match other test classes
Issue-ID: POLICY-3093
Change-Id: Ib2d947782021590ffc08d426e7a1607a8c33f98a
Signed-off-by: lapentafd <francesco.lapenta@est.tech>
|
|
Removed GroupValidationResult, replacing it with BeanValidationResult.
Modified the ParameterGroup subclasses to use BeanValidator, adding
annotations where needed to trigger the validations that had been
automatically performed by GroupValidationResult.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2059
Change-Id: I2c0c01fac355e6cde4d8d6998dc42f8a2e2ebb65
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
Addressed the following issues:
- initialize mocks before use
- use parameterized queries
- Random() is not secure
- provide parameterized type for generics
- unused imports
- constructor visibility
- use compute() instead of containsKey()/put()
- make final fields static
- rename constants to all upper case
- no assert() in Thread.run() methods
- nested try
- nested if/else
- too many break/continue
- use try-with-resources
- repeatable annotations
- overlapping characters in reg ex
- hashcode is not sufficient in compareTo()
- need equals() with compareTo()
- make class an interface
- use parameterized test
- multiple calls in assert()
- log or re-throw
- use different type of lambda
- use parameterized logging
- use StringBuilder instead of concatenation
- use StandardCharsets.UTF_8
Issue-ID: POLICY-2906
Change-Id: I2cf8c885e3e22c2c6cbe6403a34906928afad022
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2654
Change-Id: Ifd391ea9141d37cfd3ca4110d66c667962230ae1
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Replaced assertions to not have the same actual and expected expression
in apex-pdp
Issue-ID: POLICY-2761
Change-Id: I2bf45a3cc4411bd39f93f9d0b8c8e56dd318281e
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
Replaced try/catch blocks apex-pdp with assertj assertions. Part III of
changes.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2451
Change-Id: I77ee4140cdfc2066f463459f92163677c3e34ef2
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
The engineServiceFacade allows it's init() method to be called twice,
the second call should return that the facade is already initialized.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2720
Change-Id: Id241e232163a8812a72f92841ce7b11f59358d45
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Replace assertTrue with assertEquals and assertFalse with
assertNotEquals in apex-pdp/client apex-pdp/context and apex-pdp/core
Issue-ID: POLICY-2690
Change-Id: Ic1e69c75e5f8f887cac135b6728b007faf4b19a6
Signed-off-by: JvD_Ericsson <jeff.van.dam@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2188
Change-Id: I56bbf3aa3bd9e1ef433cc93ad2be0c54d141a2a5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
The prepare() and cleanup() method were not called on state finalizers
for states. This review adds calls for them.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2450
Change-Id: I27aec4dea51f3e22b5922c04c7b7b974fca24292
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
Change-Id: I305771ddef42bd3032ad52f4c5ecd55b01ed5a1a
Issue-ID: POLICY-1914
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
|
|
TaskParameters can be used to pass parameters from ApexConfig to the policy logic. In the config, these are optional.
Usage as below:
{
"engineParameters": {
"taskParameters": [
{
"key": "ParameterKey1",
"value": "ParameterValue1"
},
{
"taskId": "TaskIdVal",
"key": "ParameterKey2",
"value": "ParameterValue2"
}
]
}
}
In the taskLogic, taskParameters can be accessed as below:
eg: executor.parameters.get("ParameterKey1"))
If taskId is provided in ApexConfig for an entry, then that
parameter is updated only for that particular task. Otherwise, the task
parameter is added to all tasks.
Change-Id: I9e1b3d3697428309e7d86db40b63ffe822935b69
Issue-ID: POLICY-2364
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I73fad5bf76ed6b4979f5ab76013f204ea82da30b
Issue-ID: POLICY-2215
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Added integration test that sets properties in a dummy plugin and amends
them in tasks in a policy. Variosu tests added to check combinations of
where properties are set in plugins or in tasks or both.
Implementaiton changed to:
- Always pass in a Properies object, the properties object coming into
the policy cannot be null because the task/TSL/SFL may wish to set it
- Fix a bug where the properties were not passed from the ApexEvent to
the engine event in the ApexEventUnmarshaller class
Issue-ID: POLICY-1743
Change-Id: I6aa152b28d46cf3cc6fa56a1a95b76a8e55f5a49
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Copyright headers not changed as this review only amends comments.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1791
Change-Id: Icbeb2c6e591b3b160ae102bb67aef2d407924a4d
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1791
Change-Id: I60f65fb60ca77fe97bd1c23822038b835bd98a11
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
APEX event receiver and sender plugins sometimes need to exchange
information with tasks, especially in the case of REST communication.
This change enables passthrough of Properties from the event carrier
technology plugins to APEX task, task selection, and state finalizer
logics.
Apologies for the size of the review but this change involves passinng
the properties through all the APEX components, hence the large number
of small changes.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1742
Change-Id: I219fd69550f06702ef64adbb165fe7baac422e96
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifcd8866e65a7bc1238d5a4137f7bad288a5bfb3b
Issue-ID: POLICY-1861
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Make test classes name consitence by adding 'Test' at end of junit test classes and adding 'Support' or 'Dummy' at start of util or dummy type of test classes
Issue-ID: POLICY-1263
Change-Id: I6cb8d09799d7abd1b50ead1edbc4986649ad4ba7
Signed-off-by: Parshad Patel <pars.patel@samsung.com>
|
|
Coverage for unit test of engie state and state machine handling.
Added coverage of the facade and executor context classes
Added coverage for executors
Added coverage for the remainder of the core engine
Issue-ID: POLICY-1034
Change-Id: I85c66005dfdffdf2b4ee5672473a3ae4823d0d9c
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@ericsson.com>
|
|
This code is covered by feature testing but does not
show up in Sonar. These unit tests give coverage on engine
modules.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1034
Change-Id: Ib7a288bcb9729ec88346cc8047e38f3a58f9a97c
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@ericsson.com>
|