Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Flavor Labels are not passed to
DoCreateVnfAndModules.bpmn, in
turn it needs to be passed to
DoCreateVfModule
Issue-ID: SO-661
Change-Id: I51c4e77677a17513725d5b832e379bbb72f13185
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
- Works around a bug in OOF
where OOF does not return a serviceResourceId
with homing solutions. SO uses serviceResourceId
to match a homing deman to a homing request.
This patch addes resourceModuleName as another
way to match a demand to a request, as currently
OOF needs this to be unique.
- Changes SO homing processing of key cloudRegionId to
key locationId as this is now the key used for cloudRegionId
in solutions sent back from OOF
Issue-ID: OPTFRA-249
Change-Id: I8e5d9244a227ea4d3d061a758f202144bac270ce
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
Throw exception if resource receipe is not available for the resource
in service.
Change-Id: Ic6110a1f03d9a0f22d963812eab99e571191140d
Issue-ID: SO-422
Signed-off-by: subhash kumar singh <subhash.kumar.singh@huawei.com>
|
|
changing capitalization of SDNC in LCM property
adding payload to createVfModule bpmn
Change-Id: Ib4d8e172a929a8138cf4e3fbf446170467b44a42
Issue-ID: INT-475
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia9aaf05cd2a255491b0f73351653f1b622140e62
Issue-ID: SO-602
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-659
Change-Id: I4f7d9ce861db6d997ebc1108cdf1bd0995a7aa19
Signed-off-by: Bancala, Ben (bb3476) <bb3476@att.com>
|
|
|
|
- Fix general topic properties.
- Fix junit for getLcmProperties
Change-Id: I424129c18a017908280c6bdc831a6a72ba1192ca
Issue-ID: SO-602
Signed-off-by: Elena Kuleshov <ek1439@att.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: I71003381548d1d221854f78e0d0734994dd16d5f
Issue-ID: SO-602
Signed-off-by: Elena Kuleshov <ek1439@att.com>
|
|
Adding space to change TunnelXConn to Tunnel XConn
so that SO will match SDNC.
Change-Id: I2a752fd1c6b3ed115c8a2dafbd47e3ce24f49a57
Issue-ID: SO-650
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
|
|
- Update homing request build to send
correct request to OOF
- Use nfFunction field as resourceModuleName
requires updating nfFunction fields
during vcpeRestCust service creation in SDC
- Fix No Solution Error from OOF
- Made subscriber info and cloud info optional as OOF Homing does
not require it
- Update Homing Requests for AR to provide vgMuxInfra
modelInfo instead of vgmuxAR modelInfo as required by OOF
Issue-ID: SO-573
Change-Id: If1c41c81f387bb614be954d158d6cc4d9c48e2c8
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: I6d0d30b10615fd7b411ab723cf27fbeea2fec21e
Issue-ID: SO-602
Signed-off-by: Elena Kuleshov <ek1439@att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7d83ee933361ca16d9b05639bfb84b9c1466887c
Issue-ID: SO-602
Signed-off-by: Elena Kuleshov <ek1439@att.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-634
Change-Id: I79ac70be79345c966642dc5b99c25b4a39dc575d
Signed-off-by: guanwenyao <guanwenyao@chinamobile.com>
|
|
|
|
serviceInstanceName was not set
in CreateVcpeResCustService and not
made available in Homing Flow.
Issue-ID: SO-573
Change-Id: I9d3098aa252ceba139c75a24c71950bab70b14b6
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
OOF does not support License deman in Beijing
Issue-ID: SO-573
Change-Id: Ia7e013949773595b520ed4cbd0bbe8cb0f18922c
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
... again. Back to just changing topic.read
and topic.write based on controllerType (but
still setting controllerType too, just in
case).
Change-Id: I175d20b998c6d141ca7587504535bd7bb494563c
Issue-ID: INT-475
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
Followup to https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/48571/
Adding property sdnc-topic.read and
sdnc-topic.write to match topic.sdnc.read and
topic.sdnc.write on advice of SDNC LCM dev.
Change-Id: I3c856f126ecb2f6b1c45df818ea7d294e0440e5c
Issue-ID: INT-475
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-637
Change-Id: I0c95e5d5c7a9ea60525d103823bd22495f6ac6a6
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-636
Change-Id: Ieb6c3da2c0485585d009bfca1d689f4c485a2879
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
When controllerType is sdnc, it's still using
the appc topic names. Trying this to switch
topic based on controllerType.
Patch 2 changed to match APPCClient in ATT
code base.
Change-Id: I72e7e84720f73ac30d3d28e3387af2d537d301ad
Issue-ID: INT-475
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
Fix ressource looping if AAI response is empty for resource list.
Change-Id: I244d3836beb98ec2689c71df5c61f24f40619d96
Issue-ID: SO-632
Signed-off-by: subhash kumar singh <subhash.kumar.singh@huawei.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-634
Change-Id: Id39f2487d111099abf09330f3f2f089605cbe945
Signed-off-by: guochong <guochong@chinamobile.com>
|
|
|
|
Re: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/48031/1
SO is failing health check because pnfCheckInputs
is not found in dmaap.properties, and
pnf.properties is not being read, since
applicationContext.xml has two
PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer attributes, but
it's only using one.
Moved defaultTimeout to dmaap.properties, where
applicationContext.xml will be able to read it,
and renamed it to pnfDefaultTimeout to make it
clearer what it is.
Change-Id: I6490de472fbf4875e53204f4248c6325787c8af5
Issue-ID: SO-506
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the integration environment, there's no cloud region named att-aic.
Therefore, try without att-aic first (CLOUD-REGION)
and if that fails, try att-aic (DEFAULT-CLOUD-REGION)
Change-Id: Ie4a4a3924eb6fe1120519e124a7967a62c96428f
Issue-ID: INT-475
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
|
|
Fix resource building logic.
Change-Id: I95064d945a6ff026a0ea10336a550d9bb8af401a
Issue-ID: SO-624
Signed-off-by: subhash kumar singh <subhash.kumar.singh@huawei.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I1a4f4b9704385a17995e76d4b87484c2f588b889
Issue-ID: SO-506
Signed-off-by: biniek <lukasz.biniek@nokia.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-628
Change-Id: I6e9e44d453a72b4e9ec1a0abe99eb8028aa5ba1a
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-628
Change-Id: I3bd802fc966f466b12556d19e347a130e152a51d
Signed-off-by: Marcus G K Williams <marcus.williams@intel.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I41bf2c4d12345d46d8bf008f79d6610592e3b645
Issue-ID: SO-625
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|
|
This commit adds some robustness to the interface between the
API-H and BPMN, specifically, in how the response is handled.
I don't have proof, but there appears to be some randomness to
the json provider behavior when used with the jax-rs. Sometimes,
the serializer is adding the root element, and sometimes it
is not. Maybe there's something wrong with the configuration.
Maybe we have competing json providers. I couldn't pin this
down.
I'm almost certain it is the presence of the root element in
the content that causes the API-H code to fail parsing of the
BPMN response. This doesn't kill the request, as you might
expect, but rather, the API-H passes the BPMN response through
to the client (VID, or policy, or whatever).
The original problem (SO-586) was "fixed" by "removing the
wrapper". This "wrapper" is a needed feature of the interface
between BPMN and the API-H. We shouldn't have removed it.
The fact that the "fix" appeared to work is due to the
behavior I described in the previous paragraph. The API-H
chokes on the message, and it passes it through unchanged.
Not really what we want.
So, I don't know why the jackson/json behavior is flaky and
different now, but I can (and did) modify the API-H so it can
parse a json message whether or not it has a root element.
Note that WorkflowResponse.java (in BPMN) and CamundaResponse.java
(in the API-H) are basically the same bean representing the
message format. Seems less than ideal to have two different
classes.
Also note that I changed the name of the "response" attribute
of the WorkflowResponse and CamundaResponse classes to "content".
Got tired of seeing this nonsense everywhere in the code:
response.getResponse()
Change-Id: Icaf70f8457de99e493cf882170fe778c620308c9
Issue-ID: SO-586
Issue-ID: SO-618
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Fix bugs reported by sonar
Change-Id: I0d3445856eb45533d904443b60d75c8aa03e5881
Issue-ID: SO-580
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lynn <ethanlynnl@vmware.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I2f35d1a8cc01f349f791b1bc192f91f5f020f689
Issue-ID: SO-506
Signed-off-by: biniek <lukasz.biniek@nokia.com>
|
|
When the workflow response succeeds, the requestReferences object is being wrapped by "WorkflowResponse": {"response": {... and all the other fields from the WorkflowResponse object are being included as well. Adding a WorkflowResponseSerializer didn't seem to work since the root node was still included and there was no ObjectMapper in which to set WrapRootValue to false. So this is the next best thing.
Patch 2 fixes most of the broken unit tests.
Change-Id: Ifa5bd02e70b23f41c9042ac207848c8ade77313a
Issue-ID: SO-586
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <am153x@att.com>
|