Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
There were several issues. The wrong jackson provider was being selected,
which caused the exception, so we fixed that. Then we discovered that a
a URN mapping was missing, so we added that. Then we found that the
healthcheck wouldn't work because it's trying to check the default
process engine, which does not exist. We commented out that part of
the healthcheck to be able to resolve this high priority issue. A
new low priority issue will need to be created to follow up.
Change-Id: I327612a147333eeecd44915942cecd13959c4717
Issue-id: SO-139
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-146
Change-Id: I483f96eea7be409546ebc5c84e2332b2992672e7
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
Add VFC NS create sub work flow
Change-Id: I503419f89633a0f74a887bc3b95fbaa3acdbfd02
Issue-ID:SO-57
Signed-off-by: c00149107 <chenchuanyu@huawei.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-146
Change-Id: Id247132c451e16c49dde8b8547d50924cdfa00c4
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
IssueId:SO-56
Change-Id: Icb04ea102b1fe497d8827eac582b28a472bbb836
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
Since the 1710 MSO merge the following problems exist:
The workflow applications are not deployed properly.
I've also fixed a few small issues with the CreateCustomE2EServiceInstance
flows that prevented them from being deployed.
Change-Id: Ia4f7a6de87abbc99e80c0e9083e2175cdf9b4fe5
Issue-id: SO-148
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue-Id: SO-142
Change-Id: I2adbf796f46cb400d32ada1d7f0ae671e58b00ad
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: SO-46
Change-Id: I01b80c4eb5ee6c779dd95b840fa99a9bff0ad78e
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
Add sync response task for e2e service flow
Change-Id: I3b17e0103fb3e7cb4ba41d076bc6014acc1d295c
Issue-ID:SO-57
Signed-off-by: c00149107 <chenchuanyu@huawei.com>
|
|
Add groovy logic for E2E service
Change-Id: I3d3f1023c14d2621380933396fbc650516145da2
Issue-ID:SO-57
Signed-off-by: c00149107 <chenchuanyu@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
While creating a service-instance orchestration-status is hardcoded to be Active. The user should be allowed to set the initial status.
Issue-id: SO-108
Change-Id: Ica6febae1f7733125126b49f4f7e0e23bba2a0f2
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Shekhar <abhishek.shekhar1@amdocs.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-120
Change-Id: I58aaff6213fcc91388f1cabf3ca37838a25c1c73
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-120
Change-Id: I4282112764bc7697dd98e780bb02b13319cabb5d
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
This commit rebases changes from openecomp-mso/internal-staging-1710 up to and including this codecloud commit:
54483fc6606ddb1591a2e9da61bff8712325f924
Wed Sep 6 18:12:56 2017 -0400
Rebasing was done on a branch on top of this commit in so/master in ONAP:
93fbdfbe46104f8859d4754040f979cb7997c157
Thu Sep 7 16:42:59 2017 +0000
Change-Id: I4ad9abf40da32bf5bdca43e868b8fa2dbcd9dc59
Issue-id: SO-107
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
There are Linux Foundation rules (enforced by nexus) that I still
don't really understand. I'm convinced this is absolutely true:
The groupId of every artifact in a project MUST begin with:
org.openecomp.<project>
--or--
org.onap.<project>
The top-level artifact is no exception. So for example, this is
NOT allowed:
<groupId>org.openecomp</groupId>
<artifactId>so</groupId>
Here's what I'm trying now. The top level pom will contain:
<groupId>org.openecomp.so</groupId>
<artifactId>so-parent</artifactId>
Child modules will contain:
<parent>
<groupId>org.openecomp.so</groupId>
<artifactId>so-parent</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
</parent>
<groupId>org.openecomp.so</groupId>
<artifactId>some-child-artifact</artifactId>
Note that the groupId for the direct child module will be the
same as the groupId for its parent.
Issue: SO-21
Change-Id: I0d3cd2eb7a1883e23e3c0878ee7fa3dd4a7d55b2
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
More problems encountered since mso repos were renamed.
We now have found that this declaration in the top-level so pom
causes the deploy to fail with a 403 Forbidden error:
<groupId>org.openecomp</groupId>
<artifactId>so</artifactId>
We are changing this to:
<groupId>org.openecomp.so</groupId>
<artifactId>framework</artifactId>
Issue: SO-21
Change-Id: I4e21d689c73c5071bde725127bb81482ce3d91f9
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Since the repositories were renamed from "mso" to "so" the
artifact group IDs in the poms must be updated to match.
Issue: SO-39
Change-Id: I617fe738a77d0f6c1d1cc0ac9474fb753f4e234c
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I794b606687343851f71d63ac055ed1898320216a
Signed-off-by: Gary Wu <gary.i.wu@huawei.com>
|
|
DB fixes + BPMN flows and groovy fixes + Fix issue with CloudConfig file
not reloaded properly when it's wrong (JSON error or model hierarchy
mistake) at MSO startup
Change-Id: I2853030b78499e2a761706b643ea210955e72de3
Signed-off-by: Determe, Sebastien (sd378r) <sd378r@intl.att.com>
[MSO-8] Restore files removed in patch set 2
Those groovy files must be there
Change-Id: I9a47ac3d9c8fc06774a1b8f518491b1b0b00af04
Signed-off-by: Determe, Sebastien (sd378r) <sd378r@intl.att.com>
|
|
Second rebase containing additional features for MSO + total reworking
of the BPMN structure + Notification flow can now be added at the end of
some BPMN flows
Change-Id: I7e937c7a0ba1593ca85e164a093f79c7e38b6ce0
Signed-off-by: Determe, Sebastien (sd378r) <sd378r@intl.att.com>
|
|
Update the maven depenency for sdc-distribution-client to cooperate with the sdc changes.
Change-Id: I2da936e5c40cb68c7181bb78307192dd5655b5dc
Signed-off-by: xg353y <xg353y@intl.att.com>
|