Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Set context for VFC Create api
Change-Id: I33363c15eaa7dc0aa17921792968814970a58df0
Issue-ID:SO-212
Signed-off-by: c00149107 <chenchuanyu@huawei.com>
|
|
Add global Customer Info for VFC NS Create
Change-Id: I38fbd8c8bdc854b0f93ae2302d09f2725d83b67a
Issue-ID:SO-211
Signed-off-by: c00149107 <chenchuanyu@huawei.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
IssueId: SO-209
Change-Id: Ie1b553863f824497fbe7381f66bc1581310702af
|
|
|
|
IssueId: SO-205
Change-Id: Ib5f634c13c09c9f5df04d3973dd6c95684520d0b
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add progress and operation content for create workflow operation
Change-Id: Ib48ab5be7f65a039813db1da816dbe7ac4c0e6f1
Issue-ID:SO-206
Signed-off-by: c00149107 <chenchuanyu@huawei.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I28734d6a859179658bae15c760758006e48458d5
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
IssueId: SO-201
|
|
IssueId:SO-201
Change-Id: Ib440d2a93e8700c47d56b2e85c8e50d460362e50
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
DeleteCustomE2EServiceInstance and DoCustomDeleteE2EServiceInstance
both declared their names to be "Process_1". I've changed their
process names.
Issue: SO-200
Change-Id: Ic1fd302a38c27d0d3a1a8200b4002a55fa0625f8
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
|
|
Every throwing event needs an errorRef element.
Issue: SO-200
Change-Id: I29fe145912e38cb8697638926c4b1766047195f2
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Catch potential NullPointerException described in https://sonar.onap.org/issues/search#issues=AV7t547AlaLbmlVXT_jY
Semi-duplicate of https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/17703/
Trying again from newer branch which will hopefully fix build failures.
Change-Id: I65c9af1ec1a90bed201042cffb45f3871222a889
Issue-ID: SO-165
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Idbf4c87544c92dc6b744a859c024c773ec00e2cd
Issue-id: SO-138
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
|
|
This is how it was prior to the SO-193 fix. Some unit tests
are now failing in the jenkins environment. Maybe this will
help.
Issue: SO-193
Change-Id: Idac2a25e2f85581aaceaae10b8eacb5f312b2a70
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I05931195c51f171a59bb8f831e8fbbf7fd7ea11f
IssueId: SO-202
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
SO-201
Change-Id: I6c485d21ac31fda103072e99393beecb67b6eafa
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-200
Change-Id: Idf3f9d0f64d0942ca6d004928b788c14a1605a77
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
Flows in the MSOCommonBPMN jar, which is embedded in the
MSOInfrastructureBPMN war, are not being deployed.
MSOCommonBPMN needs a processes.xml file.
I'm also fixing a problem with CustomE2EGetService.bpmn, which claims
it is the GenericGetService flow. This creates a conflict with the
real GenericGetService flow.
Issue: SO-199
Change-Id: I1ec9d4ad079abf65b5c276b625b46a86805a15e6
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
Issue: SO-197
Change-Id: I93f8ea9deaea5b2f08b34394fcf2b2362718ca43
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
1. Coordinated jacoco and surefire JVM arg line options
2. Changed sonar plugin version to 2.19.1
3. Removed dead code (unused classes)
Issue: SO-193
Change-Id: I21b7a77510eec71f4d4ca9afde5b7f86f0e3cbd7
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
SO-191
Change-Id: Iaa800bbe6bc65672c53adf3f432362c57b19e5d7
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IssueId: SO-191
Change-Id: I720e58a0ce058f4aec0b4c04b45ac88963a2c3b2
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
Correcting license information for two classes.
Change-Id: Ibab17104bf1d1a2bb305cdb7e35a7181e2cc0871
Issue-ID: SO-171
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
Adding test cases for MSO API Handler coverage.
Change-Id: Ie4a3fc86395b9010357fb7027178933ff73150cc
Issue-ID: SO-171
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
SO-171
Change-Id: Id3af1d70eb603b1f4fd54226a0f602e9fde78b6a
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-191
Change-Id: I167a7e96f4fd3a857a6c3e679dda132fc8a7f720
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
IssueId: SO-191
Change-Id: Ic9fb77341842fd48efc81341c3a42c26d101b60d
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IssueId: SO-177
Change-Id: I19b403cb73d250d8679ce062417be376419e1f83
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
UT-Step6
IssueId: SO-172
Change-Id: I18ba0ebfd372b06e688e5a1b6d9e8b8d34cab227
Signed-off-by: Seshu-Kumar-M <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-173
Change-Id: Ic4c48cb877e19d7cd380048451a53478f83fa373
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The foreign key we fixed in the VNF_RES_CUSTOM_TO_VF_MODULE_CUSTOM
table is blocking distribution of the model. The insert that's
failing is:
insert into VNF_RES_CUSTOM_TO_VF_MODULE_CUSTOM (
VNF_RESOURCE_CUST_MODEL_CUSTOMIZATION_UUID,
VF_MODULE_CUST_MODEL_CUSTOMIZATION_UUID)
values (?, ?);
The error is: "foreign key constraint fails"
Issue: SO-180
Change-Id: I8d98bde144eb666430632b6089d8d27d66527884
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-177
Change-Id: I2ea5d5c52dca4b5258683839cfb51c6aada913cf
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
IsuueId: SO-191
Change-Id: Iac92a61eb2692f3793a21097715735501d9954bd
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|