Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Several failed attempts to split the BPMN application into
multiple applications with separate camunda process engines
have left a mess of confusing classes and process engine
definitions.
In the Amsterdam release, there should be only one BPMN
application war. This is MSOInfrastructureBPMN.
MSOCommonBPMN should not be deployed as a separate
application. Its classes are compiled into a jar and
this is included inside MSOInfrastructureBPMN.
The MSOInfrastructureBPMN application should use the
"default" process engine.
WorkflowAsyncInfrastructureResource and
MSOCommonApplication classes are not needed.
Issue: SO-322
Change-Id: Ifdb3b33541346b561a16361d1aa791e8342a34fa
Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
|
|
IssueId: SO-118
Change-Id: Ib7830bb47d41f322a14bc82b7bc99748b547d640
Signed-off-by: seshukm <seshu.kumar.m@huawei.com>
|
|
This commit rebases changes from openecomp-mso/internal-staging-1710 up to and including this codecloud commit:
54483fc6606ddb1591a2e9da61bff8712325f924
Wed Sep 6 18:12:56 2017 -0400
Rebasing was done on a branch on top of this commit in so/master in ONAP:
93fbdfbe46104f8859d4754040f979cb7997c157
Thu Sep 7 16:42:59 2017 +0000
Change-Id: I4ad9abf40da32bf5bdca43e868b8fa2dbcd9dc59
Issue-id: SO-107
Signed-off-by: Arthur Martella <amartell@research.att.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia6a7574859480717402cc2f22534d9973a78fa6d
Signed-off-by: ChrisC <cc697w@intl.att.com>
|