aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>2018-05-15 13:23:01 -0400
committerRob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>2018-05-15 13:58:10 -0400
commitd2e69c0d689596033a9c35aa98d37a44e2cc88cb (patch)
treebe29159a319f63c9e5c242da6354c1ef0133363a /common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso
parentb4d4cb8703842aee6df6c9a5d2a0fd6617539233 (diff)
WorkflowResponse json issues
This commit adds some robustness to the interface between the API-H and BPMN, specifically, in how the response is handled. I don't have proof, but there appears to be some randomness to the json provider behavior when used with the jax-rs. Sometimes, the serializer is adding the root element, and sometimes it is not. Maybe there's something wrong with the configuration. Maybe we have competing json providers. I couldn't pin this down. I'm almost certain it is the presence of the root element in the content that causes the API-H code to fail parsing of the BPMN response. This doesn't kill the request, as you might expect, but rather, the API-H passes the BPMN response through to the client (VID, or policy, or whatever). The original problem (SO-586) was "fixed" by "removing the wrapper". This "wrapper" is a needed feature of the interface between BPMN and the API-H. We shouldn't have removed it. The fact that the "fix" appeared to work is due to the behavior I described in the previous paragraph. The API-H chokes on the message, and it passes it through unchanged. Not really what we want. So, I don't know why the jackson/json behavior is flaky and different now, but I can (and did) modify the API-H so it can parse a json message whether or not it has a root element. Note that WorkflowResponse.java (in BPMN) and CamundaResponse.java (in the API-H) are basically the same bean representing the message format. Seems less than ideal to have two different classes. Also note that I changed the name of the "response" attribute of the WorkflowResponse and CamundaResponse classes to "content". Got tired of seeing this nonsense everywhere in the code: response.getResponse() Change-Id: Icaf70f8457de99e493cf882170fe778c620308c9 Issue-ID: SO-586 Issue-ID: SO-618 Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty <rd472p@att.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso')
-rw-r--r--common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso/utils/RootIgnoringObjectMapperTest.java94
1 files changed, 94 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso/utils/RootIgnoringObjectMapperTest.java b/common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso/utils/RootIgnoringObjectMapperTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1c7e845f16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/common/src/test/java/org/openecomp/mso/utils/RootIgnoringObjectMapperTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+/*-
+ * ============LICENSE_START=======================================================
+ * ONAP - SO
+ * ================================================================================
+ * Copyright (C) 2018 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
+ * ================================================================================
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ * ============LICENSE_END=========================================================
+ */
+
+package org.openecomp.mso.utils;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;
+
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonProperty;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.annotation.JsonRootName;
+import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
+
+public class RootIgnoringObjectMapperTest {
+
+ @Test
+ public void someObjectWithoutRootTest() throws Exception {
+ ObjectMapper mapper = new RootIgnoringObjectMapper<SomeObject>(SomeObject.class);
+
+ String content = "{"
+ + "\"attribute\":\"charm\""
+ + "}";
+
+ SomeObject response = mapper.readValue(content, SomeObject.class);
+ assertEquals("SomeObject[attribute=charm]", response.toString());
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void someObjectWithRootTest() throws Exception {
+ ObjectMapper mapper = new RootIgnoringObjectMapper<SomeObject>(SomeObject.class);
+
+ String content = "{\"SomeObject\":{"
+ + "\"attribute\":\"charm\""
+ + "}}";
+
+ SomeObject response = mapper.readValue(content, SomeObject.class);
+ assertEquals("SomeObject[attribute=charm]", response.toString());
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void annotatedObjectWithoutRootTest() throws Exception {
+ ObjectMapper mapper = new RootIgnoringObjectMapper<AnnotatedObject>(AnnotatedObject.class);
+
+ String content = "{"
+ + "\"attribute\":\"charm\""
+ + "}";
+
+ AnnotatedObject response = mapper.readValue(content, AnnotatedObject.class);
+ assertEquals("AnnotatedObject[attribute=charm]", response.toString());
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void annotatedObjectWithRootTest() throws Exception {
+ ObjectMapper mapper = new RootIgnoringObjectMapper<AnnotatedObject>(AnnotatedObject.class);
+
+ String content = "{\"annotated-object\":{"
+ + "\"attribute\":\"charm\""
+ + "}}";
+
+ AnnotatedObject response = mapper.readValue(content, AnnotatedObject.class);
+ assertEquals("AnnotatedObject[attribute=charm]", response.toString());
+ }
+
+ public static class SomeObject {
+
+ @JsonProperty("attribute")
+ private String attribute;
+
+ public String toString() {
+ return getClass().getSimpleName() + "[attribute=" + attribute + "]";
+ }
+ }
+
+ @JsonRootName(value = "annotated-object")
+ public static class AnnotatedObject extends SomeObject {
+ }
+} \ No newline at end of file