Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Addressed the following sonars:
- too many assertions in test method
- rename test class
- use static method to modify static field
- use already defined constant
- code always returns the same value
- use assertNotSame
- use appropriate class name to access static method
- define a constant
- extract nested try block
- don't always return the same value
- use remove() instead of set(null) for thread-local-storage
- add @Override
Issue-ID: POLICY-2852
Change-Id: Icc62acd4ad57afa2d44ed4cdca504a3ac0810228
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
Tdjam junits were randomly failing. Traced it down to the fact that the
locks were being released asynchronously and thus were not always
released when the next test cases requested them.
Also simplified logging for tdjam junit tests.
Fixed the property file so it isn't overwritten by the junit tests.
Changes per review comments:
- changed "Pattern" to "pattern" in logback xml
Issue-ID: POLICY-2789
Change-Id: I325ec69cf7affa531d3c575e3a34bc0b0e1edac7
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2789
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Change-Id: I4335cf77bd4a228fe0bec2d5eb529789e8144406
|
|
junits consistently fail in staging jobs
Issue-ID: POLICY-2789
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Change-Id: I968bd9ec2c3e8278358ef3c487592c0b833cef36
|
|
staging job fails as there is no guard dependency.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2789
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Change-Id: I4d803e269c7199ddeb2ebb52df5368259e4f22cd
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2789
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Change-Id: Ia78684b0f56007941ad6038d78b97bc70f9aa1bb
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
|
|
the details is on wiki:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/tdjam+Feature+for+Tosca-Driven+Control+Loops
Fixed some eclipse warnings.
Revised the interaction between a manager and its SerialWorkQueue to
address some threading issues. The original code started processing
the event as soon as the manager was created, WHILE it was still being
added to the map. During junit tests, the event responses came back,
within the same thread, which then attempted to remove the manager from
the map. This resulted in a ConcurrentHashMap exception.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2415
Change-Id: I94a4152637be76e5b2aea2d869afd84dfb413a0e
Signed-off-by: Straubs, Ralph (rs8887) <rs8887@att.com>
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Signed-off-by: Taka Cho <takamune.cho@att.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Hahn <jrh3@att.com>
|