Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Integation unit tests resultd in StackOverflowException errors in the
Graal Javascript interpreter. Following extensive testing and
trouobleshooting, it proved very difficult to fix these issues in Graal
as the stck overflow errors were occurring in native class instantiation
methods being invoked by Grall on the JVM.
The alternative Rhino Javascript engine is developed by mozilla, and was
incorporated into the Java 6 JVM and evolved into Nashorn in the Java 8
JVM. Oracle dropped Nashorn in Java 11. However, in parallel, Rhino
development has continued.
This review brings in the Rhino javascript engine into apex-pdp as the
replacement for Nashorn and instead of Graal. Graal seems to be pretty
unstable as yet so we may bring it in in future releases but for now
Rhino is a more stable and reliable alternative.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I0edeff3b0bee404b38e3ebe22001a6e3375a44dc
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Graal enforces Javascript more strictly than Nashorn does. This review
changes the tests in apex-pdp to comply with the stricter -Javascript
checking, re-enabling the integration test module.
- All log calls must be passed as strings, using toString()
- Byte/Float/Long Java types not supported in Javascript
Disable integration tests so that other changes can be brought in.
JMS integration test is disabled for now, it will be re-enabled in a
review shortly.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I14bdb930eff735e862b51802cf72e4793cec3699
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I5d01766ffb0104f632bebc9b553e7dca83b4829f
Issue-ID: POLICY-2364
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1936
Change-Id: Ifc720cd320f5eced2f3c039b2ce6442387de240b
Signed-off-by: ning.xi <ning.xi@est.tech>
|
|
Added integration test that sets properties in a dummy plugin and amends
them in tasks in a policy. Variosu tests added to check combinations of
where properties are set in plugins or in tasks or both.
Implementaiton changed to:
- Always pass in a Properies object, the properties object coming into
the policy cannot be null because the task/TSL/SFL may wish to set it
- Fix a bug where the properties were not passed from the ApexEvent to
the engine event in the ApexEventUnmarshaller class
Issue-ID: POLICY-1743
Change-Id: I6aa152b28d46cf3cc6fa56a1a95b76a8e55f5a49
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|