Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
apex-pdp had an in-line docuemntation build system built on asciidoc. It
has proven to be very difficult to maintain and keep up to date and it
is incompatible with the ONAP official RST/ReadTheDocs docuementation
system.
In the Dublin release, we converted the asciidoc documentation to RST
format, and hae been updating the RST documentation since. The asciidoc
docuemntation system is now so out of date that it is being removed.
In this change, the "site" directory is removed from all modules in
apex-pdp and a profile called "apexSite" is removed from the pom.xml
file in all modules.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2686
Change-Id: I645f3ed101159d356cd90e619cef791067ad5eb5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2695
Change-Id: I15b489de9ca2614e3a6c94b450a3d6397d17d4ff
Signed-off-by: Ram Krishna Verma <ram_krishna.verma@bell.ca>
|
|
The URL parameter must always be provided on the REST client carrier plugin
The URL parameter must always be provided on the REST requestor consumer
The URL parameter is not required on the REST requestor producer
This patch fixes the implementation to always checks the URL for existence on
the REST Client plugin. The current checks on the REST Requestor are correct
for the REST requestor plugin consumer and producer classes, so the checks
are not required in the REST Requestor parameters.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2692
Change-Id: I4e1534202002cf4a03bd159ac97b2a4f5b1746ab
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib39e798d733727bdc676755b66adf2c499e618af
Issue-ID: POLICY-2655
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Change-Id: I0da222e592e6e29f0afca4a1515d8f126fe91cbb
Issue-ID: POLICY-2623
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2188
Change-Id: I56bbf3aa3bd9e1ef433cc93ad2be0c54d141a2a5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2630
Signed-off-by: huaxing <huaxing.jin@est.tech>
Change-Id: I6475f9272c1a770836af537c13b23e486b66ac3e
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2514
Change-Id: I764cfe41ed8cf8ffebd4ff076d0b76b79d61e142
Signed-off-by: RossC <ross.carter@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2514
Change-Id: I5b130b052150eb0e51759c751b83ab9d6f199759
Signed-off-by: RossC <ross.carter@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic668ab20498bdc41edc78f52c7ce9d89a1385f19
Issue-ID: POLICY-2378
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
The Web Socket server is marked as started before the start process has
complted. This change fixes that issue.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1470
Change-Id: I5b5ef5832893d884a6551b0516df91cb71d6c622
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
When consumers and producers are paired as in the case of the REST
Rquestor, both sides must come up and be wired together in the
initiation phase of apex-pdp before the consumers and producers start
handling envents.
In the ApexActivator class, the consumers were started immediately after
they were initialized meaning that a consumer could return events to a
producer that had not started yet.
This change fixes the ApexActivator so that it waits until all consumers
and producers are initialized before starting event handling.
It also fixes the timings on RestRequestor tests and tidies up the unit
tests.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2469
Change-Id: Ib66d9531bf21f2a879ab33795aded4f48e7bfbc6
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I7bd44f8dfe349d73a4c8c4f978a30b455c45b2c7
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I59b93fccb0f3a41f8db753d1e8e2978bbb51e9a0
Issue-ID: POLICY-2378
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2402
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Change-Id: I6bd157d80a0aa1604e634ec561ee76e8197e97df
|
|
Some minor checkstyle and eclipse warnings have crept into the code in
the last few weeks. This review cleams them up.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: Ib5f103bc28c71a6c4db05ea05719eff41bb38914
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: If76ddc860b67e0d8dcd4c48bacb5436ffc773faa
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Signed-off-by: aditya.puthuparambil <aditya.puthuparambil@est.tech>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
Change-Id: I305771ddef42bd3032ad52f4c5ecd55b01ed5a1a
Issue-ID: POLICY-1914
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
A number of Java 11, checkstyle, and SONAR warnings have crept into the
Apex codebase over the last number of reviews. This change fixes those
issues.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I2afd607e80f48323355380fb2fe5e048e18879f9
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1884
Change-Id: I7774dfdc7d7edcc0409a817bfd21ddacec21d085
Signed-off-by: ning.xi <ning.xi@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove consumer code duplication in plugins-event-carrier
Issue-ID: POLICY-1884
Signed-off-by: shaoqiu <tim.huang@est.tech>
Change-Id: I2d222436a97224e54a03c2501f4dc14d3f5f6ac0
|
|
TaskParameters can be used to pass parameters from ApexConfig to the policy logic. In the config, these are optional.
Usage as below:
{
"engineParameters": {
"taskParameters": [
{
"key": "ParameterKey1",
"value": "ParameterValue1"
},
{
"taskId": "TaskIdVal",
"key": "ParameterKey2",
"value": "ParameterValue2"
}
]
}
}
In the taskLogic, taskParameters can be accessed as below:
eg: executor.parameters.get("ParameterKey1"))
If taskId is provided in ApexConfig for an entry, then that
parameter is updated only for that particular task. Otherwise, the task
parameter is added to all tasks.
Change-Id: I9e1b3d3697428309e7d86db40b63ffe822935b69
Issue-ID: POLICY-2364
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1884
Change-Id: I610d7ee34d640cc3a7d3381b24993ee9b6f76f2d
Signed-off-by: ning.xi <ning.xi@est.tech>
|
|
apex-pdp
Change-Id: I6de1fd31c2e73814a546b05ee71419fded4a3357
Issue-ID: POLICY-2147
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Currently APEX specific information is placed under properties|content in ToscaPolicy.
Avoid keeping under "content" and keep the information directly under properties.
Change-Id: Ic437271c9a2d71104013b5568af5525df4a4bb56
Issue-ID: POLICY-2332
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
This class was moved to policy-common some time ago. Removing it in
apex-pdp.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I982fbd799334b34f1526e19f339236b52205b91e
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
This change brings in the minimum changes to get apex-pdp running in
Java 11. Other reviews will bring in changes to remove Java 11 warnings
and to convert apex-pdp Javascript handling from the now deprecated
nashorn engine.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1581
Change-Id: I879bbae08d4e67aca3f1bfeedeca639d8dbbc281
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
THis change updates the vCPE example to show how the example can work
towards the APPC using Avro schemas only. This means that Policies can
be adapted to changes in controller APIs using Avro alone.
This example works with the old and new format policy-models.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2043
Change-Id: I42ac0eac5203eaa37316cf6c460c67f7e8d6deb2
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Apex to populate the PdpStatistics data in every heartbeat sent to PAP
Issue-ID: POLICY-2302
Change-Id: I2d3a6c1e8605d53bf754a135980527bd50762abd
Signed-off-by: shaoqiu <tim.huang@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: If8167c837d7d28ec9049b00ff6ca314eb4199930
Issue-ID: POLICY-2279
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Iafd2e2625cfabd89480ca1807eb1607788b30899
Issue-ID: POLICY-2235
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
The laest Eclipse checkstyle version 8.26.0 does more thorough checking
and identified a number of small issues in the apex-pdp codebase. This
review fixes those issues.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I30ba25e3e425c6d54c77f925e8da3ab841a8357c
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1861
Change-Id: Iccbdcbc5b5978305c56ab74c01a52a562697bee1
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: If0ad9c6b3a0f19ff3711d6230eb64e0dca1c1ef1
Issue-ID: POLICY-2272
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I6cff921bdc65fe505c0b5e7dba94a6cf9aa3ba91
Issue-ID: POLICY-2234
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I73fad5bf76ed6b4979f5ab76013f204ea82da30b
Issue-ID: POLICY-2215
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
The changes in policy-models for appclcm had knock-on impacts on the
apex-pdp example policies. This patch fixes the vCPE policy to comply
with the new APPCLCM POJOs.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2043
Change-Id: Ieebc2cf97a05efde560a2f5a819924ff63dfd695
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
There is no need to have Jersey dependencies in the PDP POMs as they are
inherited from the policy-endpoints POM.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2209
Change-Id: I5c53e7b29f4df25fd730f7a521e149e4ee70d964
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Add a common version of Jersey for all Policy Framework components.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2209
Change-Id: I6282bc9938cbb63ddf3bf85e488f7b6be0dbdfc3
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifaedc5074bcc51a5d495e342feae89b6a2aac1cf
Issue-ID: POLICY-1626
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Also added defaultbranch to the .gitreview file to make it easier
to change it when apex-pdp is branched in the future.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2045
Signed-off-by: jrh3 <jrh3@att.com>
Change-Id: Ib2570fd395aae38862299f2193b07ab06e32ace5
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1988
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
Change-Id: I576cf60ef4915f9e79246c42f0dd90710a244f47
Signed-off-by: jhh <jorge.hernandez-herrero@att.com>
|
|
engine failure
PDP-A goes to ACTIVE state even when the APEX engine failed to start.
This is fixed.
Change-Id: Iad4b45abf257f68267dd2526a624dc6d882c84af
Issue-ID: POLICY-1980
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1965
Signed-off-by: jrh3 <jrh3@att.com>
Change-Id: Icd437f10c4d991030652ffa1abf48b7b5738145c
|