Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2188
Change-Id: I56bbf3aa3bd9e1ef433cc93ad2be0c54d141a2a5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2514
Change-Id: I764cfe41ed8cf8ffebd4ff076d0b76b79d61e142
Signed-off-by: RossC <ross.carter@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2514
Change-Id: I5b130b052150eb0e51759c751b83ab9d6f199759
Signed-off-by: RossC <ross.carter@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: Ic668ab20498bdc41edc78f52c7ce9d89a1385f19
Issue-ID: POLICY-2378
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Signed-off-by: huaxing <huaxing.jin@est.tech>
Change-Id: Id1a9a6b6f7a9c8c74dd69bd0d30af05162a92cd1
|
|
The Web Socket server is marked as started before the start process has
complted. This change fixes that issue.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1470
Change-Id: I5b5ef5832893d884a6551b0516df91cb71d6c622
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
When consumers and producers are paired as in the case of the REST
Rquestor, both sides must come up and be wired together in the
initiation phase of apex-pdp before the consumers and producers start
handling envents.
In the ApexActivator class, the consumers were started immediately after
they were initialized meaning that a consumer could return events to a
producer that had not started yet.
This change fixes the ApexActivator so that it waits until all consumers
and producers are initialized before starting event handling.
It also fixes the timings on RestRequestor tests and tidies up the unit
tests.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2469
Change-Id: Ib66d9531bf21f2a879ab33795aded4f48e7bfbc6
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2467
Change-Id: Iea562574f466775f4dd443fc4ef9ecaa6ba610fd
Signed-off-by: Ram Krishna Verma <ram_krishna.verma@bell.ca>
|
|
All the Kafka components need something near 10 seconds to come up
completely. This review tweaks the timing to allow the test Kafka server
to come up and to allow the consumers to connect to it.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I6dd8ace0848bdc2549e658ef8908b4d85d5ea789
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I7bd44f8dfe349d73a4c8c4f978a30b455c45b2c7
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie01b221e182dd43e85e3e7277bb55169f85a1460
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
Issue-ID: POLICY-2449
Change-Id: Icbb7a769eb8f0d9ef278d222ab007f330576abb3
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Added tests to check threads start, execute, and stop correctly and
fixed JavescriptExecutor class to handle startup and shutdown correctly
without hanging.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I9ab41023aae2ab1cbcaea53fdf5d48eccd90a2f1
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I59b93fccb0f3a41f8db753d1e8e2978bbb51e9a0
Issue-ID: POLICY-2378
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
This change ignores the tests that are hanging in Jenkins until the Apex
images are released. Once the images are released we'll fix these tests.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I6a733896da044d3f24443ac202d6122a341db135
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
It is possible that the initiation and especially shutdown happens so
fast that the execution thread counts down the latch before the caller
calls await(), in which case the Javascript Rhino thread will hang. This
review adds a timeout on the await calls.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: Icfc6d4b478cca62522461c25d61ce9ee7328684a
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
When a policy is loaded, a separate thread is spawned for each
Javascript script executor. This allows us to precompile the Javascript
scripts and also to have a larger stack available for script execution.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I97323aafb623ba537ac1889b3c9504b345b4f67e
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Some minor checkstyle and eclipse warnings have crept into the code in
the last few weeks. This review cleams them up.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: Ib5f103bc28c71a6c4db05ea05719eff41bb38914
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
All examples are converted to Rhino Javascript from Nashorn Javascript.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: Ia6fec5b57b1e6131799b4b069968e4766ce54c96
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I21d9253f41eee9b958e8fb723f6c19f266502cef
Issue-ID: POLICY-1656
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Integation unit tests resultd in StackOverflowException errors in the
Graal Javascript interpreter. Following extensive testing and
trouobleshooting, it proved very difficult to fix these issues in Graal
as the stck overflow errors were occurring in native class instantiation
methods being invoked by Grall on the JVM.
The alternative Rhino Javascript engine is developed by mozilla, and was
incorporated into the Java 6 JVM and evolved into Nashorn in the Java 8
JVM. Oracle dropped Nashorn in Java 11. However, in parallel, Rhino
development has continued.
This review brings in the Rhino javascript engine into apex-pdp as the
replacement for Nashorn and instead of Graal. Graal seems to be pretty
unstable as yet so we may bring it in in future releases but for now
Rhino is a more stable and reliable alternative.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I0edeff3b0bee404b38e3ebe22001a6e3375a44dc
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Graal enforces Javascript more strictly than Nashorn does. This review
changes the tests in apex-pdp to comply with the stricter -Javascript
checking, re-enabling the integration test module.
- All log calls must be passed as strings, using toString()
- Byte/Float/Long Java types not supported in Javascript
Disable integration tests so that other changes can be brought in.
JMS integration test is disabled for now, it will be re-enabled in a
review shortly.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: I14bdb930eff735e862b51802cf72e4793cec3699
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
Change-Id: I305771ddef42bd3032ad52f4c5ecd55b01ed5a1a
Issue-ID: POLICY-1914
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: I586153244dbd97a41e9b9d616ee9a84327b7c2da
Issue-ID: POLICY-1656
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
use common version
Issue-ID: POLICY-2381
Change-Id: Id231aa8709b3c4515fcac80b82d53fb8ed45eaf0
Signed-off-by: Pamela Dragosh <pdragosh@research.att.com>
|
|
|
|
Change-Id: I8ac07eede6758c84a4a9ca505382f215d531cf47
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Signed-off-by: aditya.puthuparambil <aditya.puthuparambil@est.tech>
|
|
This is the main review to switch out the Nashorn Javascript interpreter
and switch in the Graal javascript interpreter for apex Javascript
tasks.
The Graal Javascript dialect differs slightly from Nashorn in the way it
accesses information passed over from the Java world so Javascript
tasks need to be converted.
Subsequent reviews will convert the JUnit tests marked @Ignore in
previous reviews to this one and will convert the Javascript tasks into
a format Graal can handle. Subsequent reviews will also convert the
examples over to Graal format.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2106
Change-Id: Ief582a36539e8a87724c17fb7e56864d5e471c07
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
A number of Java 11, checkstyle, and SONAR warnings have crept into the
Apex codebase over the last number of reviews. This change fixes those
issues.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I2afd607e80f48323355380fb2fe5e048e18879f9
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1884
Change-Id: I7774dfdc7d7edcc0409a817bfd21ddacec21d085
Signed-off-by: ning.xi <ning.xi@est.tech>
|
|
|
|
Remove consumer code duplication in plugins-event-carrier
Issue-ID: POLICY-1884
Signed-off-by: shaoqiu <tim.huang@est.tech>
Change-Id: I2d222436a97224e54a03c2501f4dc14d3f5f6ac0
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1884
Change-Id: I610d7ee34d640cc3a7d3381b24993ee9b6f76f2d
Signed-off-by: ning.xi <ning.xi@est.tech>
|
|
This class was moved to policy-common some time ago. Removing it in
apex-pdp.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I982fbd799334b34f1526e19f339236b52205b91e
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
This change brings in the minimum changes to get apex-pdp running in
Java 11. Other reviews will bring in changes to remove Java 11 warnings
and to convert apex-pdp Javascript handling from the now deprecated
nashorn engine.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1581
Change-Id: I879bbae08d4e67aca3f1bfeedeca639d8dbbc281
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
The laest Eclipse checkstyle version 8.26.0 does more thorough checking
and identified a number of small issues in the apex-pdp codebase. This
review fixes those issues.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1913
Change-Id: I30ba25e3e425c6d54c77f925e8da3ab841a8357c
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1861
Change-Id: Iccbdcbc5b5978305c56ab74c01a52a562697bee1
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Logging dialled back in logback.xml files and on ligging statements in
unit test java code.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2272
Change-Id: I3b9a46d8993b1571c8dc62687a9c136af46c1f51
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
The new version of JRuby fixes this issue. Also amended unit test to
check for shutdown and immediate recreation of JRuby interpreter.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1276
Change-Id: I723e0396985d3163b483e52fdaceb4b4fab7274b
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
There is no need to have Jersey dependencies in the PDP POMs as they are
inherited from the policy-endpoints POM.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2209
Change-Id: I5c53e7b29f4df25fd730f7a521e149e4ee70d964
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Add a common version of Jersey for all Policy Framework components.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2209
Change-Id: I6282bc9938cbb63ddf3bf85e488f7b6be0dbdfc3
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifaedc5074bcc51a5d495e342feae89b6a2aac1cf
Issue-ID: POLICY-1626
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-1915
Change-Id: I8702a8b54e158dfd0ac08140ca083f14f23963a2
Signed-off-by: Henry.Sun <henry.a.sun@est.tech>
|
|
Dependencies were spelt incorrectly in the dependency management section
of the main apex-pdp POM.
Issue-ID: POLICY-2115
Change-Id: I622dafe9f74b82dcc1c094eaee4ec113fe7f9c99
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|