Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This review addresses two main changes:
1) inputFields and outputFields are not tied to task definition anymore.
Instead inputEvent and outputEvents associated to a task is populated
as part of the policy state definition, as the state definition have
the information anyway.
- Clean up of the usage of inputFields and outputFields in task
definition will happen in a future review
- inputFields and outputFields defined in task definition in
policies until honolulu will not make the policy invalid as the
changes are done in backward compatible way.
2) Multiple output events can come out of a final state now.
- Define another policy state output with the relevant eventName in
the command file
- In the task logic, create a map to store the fields of the relevant
outputEvent, and then just call
"executor.addFieldsToOutput(<the_map_of_fields>)"
These 2 steps are enough to send multiple events to relevant
components as per the apex configuration.
Change-Id: Id88ca402704106404f529e595e1a76f6bf167876
Issue-ID: POLICY-3336
Signed-off-by: a.sreekumar <ajith.sreekumar@bell.ca>
|
|
|
|
Replaced try/catch blocks with assertj assertions in apex-pdp. Last
batch of changes
Issue-ID: POLICY-2451
Change-Id: I39bd02fdbd8389818dcf1b786189c1e344ddcea5
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
Removed try/catch blocks in apex-pdp with assertj assertions Part IV
Issue-ID: POLICY-2451
Change-Id: I4b6accb9f944195db9ccf8a5de165b169301ac7f
Signed-off-by: waynedunican <wayne.dunican@est.tech>
|
|
Issue-ID: POLICY-2188
Change-Id: I56bbf3aa3bd9e1ef433cc93ad2be0c54d141a2a5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Added integration test that sets properties in a dummy plugin and amends
them in tasks in a policy. Variosu tests added to check combinations of
where properties are set in plugins or in tasks or both.
Implementaiton changed to:
- Always pass in a Properies object, the properties object coming into
the policy cannot be null because the task/TSL/SFL may wish to set it
- Fix a bug where the properties were not passed from the ApexEvent to
the engine event in the ApexEventUnmarshaller class
Issue-ID: POLICY-1743
Change-Id: I6aa152b28d46cf3cc6fa56a1a95b76a8e55f5a49
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
APEX event receiver and sender plugins sometimes need to exchange
information with tasks, especially in the case of REST communication.
This change enables passthrough of Properties from the event carrier
technology plugins to APEX task, task selection, and state finalizer
logics.
Apologies for the size of the review but this change involves passinng
the properties through all the APEX components, hence the large number
of small changes.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1742
Change-Id: I219fd69550f06702ef64adbb165fe7baac422e96
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Some minor line length and formatting checkstyle warnings fixed.
Change-Id: Ib92069bbdb444560083e6d0dbf5d16a3ab824d82
Issue-ID: POLICY-1074
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|
|
Code coverage in the Apex-PDP plugins is very low. JUnit coverage will be
increased for the Plugins over the Dublin design timeline.
Issue-ID: POLICY-1379
Change-Id: Ie70ab5a9be650818cb330ec5be2a89a5db6153c5
Signed-off-by: liamfallon <liam.fallon@est.tech>
|