diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/oom_developer_guide.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/oom_developer_guide.rst | 637 |
1 files changed, 637 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/oom_developer_guide.rst b/docs/oom_developer_guide.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..1c18044b70 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/oom_developer_guide.rst @@ -0,0 +1,637 @@ +.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. +.. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 +.. Copyright 2018 Amdocs, Bell Canada + +.. Links +.. _Helm: https://docs.helm.sh/ +.. _Kubernetes: https://Kubernetes.io/ +.. _Docker: https://www.docker.com/ +.. _Nexus: https://nexus.onap.org/#welcome +.. _AWS Elastic Block Store: https://aws.amazon.com/ebs/ +.. _Azure File: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/storage/files/storage-files-introduction +.. _GCE Persistent Disk: https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/disks/ +.. _Gluster FS: https://www.gluster.org/ +.. _Kubernetes Storage Class: https://Kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/storage/storage-classes/ +.. _Assigning Pods to Nodes: https://Kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/configuration/assign-pod-node/ + +.. _developer-guide-label: + +OOM Developer Guide +################### + +.. figure:: oomLogoV2-medium.png + :align: right + +ONAP consists of a large number of components, each of which are substantial +projects within themselves, which results in a high degree of complexity in +deployment and management. To cope with this complexity the ONAP Operations +Manager (OOM) uses a Helm_ model of ONAP - Helm being the primary management +system for Kubernetes_ container systems - to drive all user driven life-cycle +management operations. The Helm model of ONAP is composed of a set of +hierarchical Helm charts that define the structure of the ONAP components and +the configuration of these components. These charts are fully parameterized +such that a single environment file defines all of the parameters needed to +deploy ONAP. A user of ONAP may maintain several such environment files to +control the deployment of ONAP in multiple environments such as development, +pre-production, and production. + +The following sections describe how the ONAP Helm charts are constructed. + +.. contents:: + :depth: 3 + :local: +.. + +Container Background +==================== +Linux containers allow for an application and all of its operating system +dependencies to be packaged and deployed as a single unit without including a +guest operating system as done with virtual machines. The most popular +container solution is Docker_ which provides tools for container management +like the Docker Host (dockerd) which can create, run, stop, move, or delete a +container. Docker has a very popular registry of containers images that can be +used by any Docker system; however, in the ONAP context, Docker images are +built by the standard CI/CD flow and stored in Nexus_ repositories. OOM uses +the "standard" ONAP docker containers and three new ones specifically created +for OOM. + +Containers are isolated from each other primarily via name spaces within the +Linux kernel without the need for multiple guest operating systems. As such, +multiple containers can be deployed with little overhead such as all of ONAP +can be deployed on a single host. With some optimization of the ONAP components +(e.g. elimination of redundant database instances) it may be possible to deploy +ONAP on a single laptop computer. + +Helm Charts +=========== + +Standard Chart Format +--------------------- + +Helm charts are available in the open-source community for a wide variety of +common software components which are used in ONAP and where possible. + + +Chart Hierarchy +--------------- + +Dependency Management +--------------------- +These Helm charts describe the desired state +of an ONAP deployment and instruct the Kubernetes container manager as to how +to maintain the deployment in this state. These dependencies dictate the order +in-which the containers are started for the first time such that such +dependencies are always met without arbitrary sleep times between container +startups. For example, the SDC back-end container requires the Elastic-Search, +Cassandra and Kibana containers within SDC to be ready and is also dependent on +DMaaP (or the message-router) to be ready - where ready implies the built-in +"readiness" probes succeeded - before becoming fully operational. When an +initial deployment of ONAP is requested the current state of the system is NULL +so ONAP is deployed by the Kubernetes manager as a set of Docker containers on +one or more predetermined hosts. The hosts could be physical machines or +virtual machines. When deploying on virtual machines the resulting system will +be very similar to "Heat" based deployments, i.e. Docker containers running +within a set of VMs, the primary difference being that the allocation of +containers to VMs is done dynamically with OOM and statically with "Heat". +Example SO deployment descriptor file shows SO's dependency on its mariadb +data-base component: + +SO deployment specification excerpt: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 + kind: Deployment + metadata: + name: {{ include "common.name" . }} + namespace: {{ include "common.namespace" . }} + labels: + app: {{ include "common.name" . }} + chart: {{ .Chart.Name }}-{{ .Chart.Version | replace "+" "_" }} + release: {{ .Release.Name }} + heritage: {{ .Release.Service }} + spec: + replicas: {{ .Values.replicaCount }} + template: + metadata: + labels: + app: {{ include "common.name" . }} + release: {{ .Release.Name }} + spec: + initContainers: + - command: + - /root/ready.py + args: + - --container-name + - so-mariadb + env: + ... + +Kubernetes Container Orchestration +================================== +The ONAP components are managed by the Kubernetes_ container management system +which maintains the desired state of the container system as described by one +or more deployment descriptors - similar in concept to OpenStack HEAT +Orchestration Templates. The following sections describe the fundamental +objects managed by Kubernetes, the network these components use to communicate +with each other and other entities outside of ONAP and the templates that +describe the configuration and desired state of the ONAP components. + +Name Spaces +----------- +Within the namespaces are Kubernetes services that provide external connectivity to pods that host Docker containers. + +ONAP Components to Kubernetes Object Relationships +-------------------------------------------------- +Kubernetes deployments consist of multiple objects: + +- **nodes** - a worker machine - either physical or virtual - that hosts + multiple containers managed by Kubernetes. +- **services** - an abstraction of a logical set of pods that provide a + micro-service. +- **pods** - one or more (but typically one) container(s) that provide specific + application functionality. +- **persistent volumes** - One or more permanent volumes need to be established + to hold non-ephemeral configuration and state data. + +The relationship between these objects is shown in the following figure: + +.. .. uml:: +.. +.. @startuml +.. node PH { +.. component Service { +.. component Pod0 +.. component Pod1 +.. } +.. } +.. +.. database PV +.. @enduml + +.. figure:: kubernetes_objects.png + +OOM uses these Kubernetes objects as described in the following sections. + +Nodes +~~~~~ +OOM works with both physical and virtual worker machines. + +* Virtual Machine Deployments - If ONAP is to be deployed onto a set of virtual machines, the creation of the VMs is outside of the scope of OOM and could be done in many ways, such as + + * manually, for example by a user using the OpenStack Horizon dashboard or AWS EC2, or + * automatically, for example with the use of a OpenStack Heat Orchestration Template which builds an ONAP stack, Azure ARM template, AWS CloudFormation Template, or + * orchestrated, for example with Cloudify creating the VMs from a TOSCA template and controlling their life cycle for the life of the ONAP deployment. + +* Physical Machine Deployments - If ONAP is to be deployed onto physical machines there are several options but the recommendation is to use Rancher along with Helm to associate hosts with a Kubernetes cluster. + +Pods +~~~~ +A group of containers with shared storage and networking can be grouped together into a Kubernetes pod. All of the containers within a pod are co-located and co-scheduled so they operate as a single unit. Within ONAP Amsterdam release, pods are mapped one-to-one to docker containers although this may change in the future. As explained in the Services section below the use of Pods within each ONAP component is abstracted from other ONAP components. + +Services +~~~~~~~~ +OOM uses the Kubernetes service abstraction to provide a consistent access +point for each of the ONAP components independent of the pod or container +architecture of that component. For example, the SDNC component may introduce +OpenDaylight clustering as some point and change the number of pods in this +component to three or more but this change will be isolated from the other ONAP +components by the service abstraction. A service can include a load balancer +on its ingress to distribute traffic between the pods and even react to dynamic +changes in the number of pods if they are part of a replica set. + +Persistent Volumes +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +To enable ONAP to be deployed into a wide variety of cloud infrastructures a +flexible persistent storage architecture, built on Kubernetes persistent +volumes, provides the ability to define the physical storage in a central +location and have all ONAP components securely store their data. + +When deploying ONAP into a public cloud, available storage services such as +`AWS Elastic Block Store`_, `Azure File`_, or `GCE Persistent Disk`_ are +options. Alternatively, when deploying into a private cloud the storage +architecture might consist of Fiber Channel, `Gluster FS`_, or iSCSI. Many +other storage options existing, refer to the `Kubernetes Storage Class`_ +documentation for a full list of the options. The storage architecture may vary +from deployment to deployment but in all cases a reliable, redundant storage +system must be provided to ONAP with which the state information of all ONAP +components will be securely stored. The Storage Class for a given deployment is +a single parameter listed in the ONAP values.yaml file and therefore is easily +customized. Operation of this storage system is outside the scope of the OOM. + +.. code-block:: yaml + + Insert values.yaml code block with storage block here + +Once the storage class is selected and the physical storage is provided, the +ONAP deployment step creates a pool of persistent volumes within the given +physical storage that is used by all of the ONAP components. ONAP components +simply make a claim on these persistent volumes (PV), with a persistent volume +claim (PVC), to gain access to their storage. + +The following figure illustrates the relationships between the persistent +volume claims, the persistent volumes, the storage class, and the physical +storage. + +.. graphviz:: + + digraph PV { + label = "Persistance Volume Claim to Physical Storage Mapping" + { + node [shape=cylinder] + D0 [label="Drive0"] + D1 [label="Drive1"] + Dx [label="Drivex"] + } + { + node [shape=Mrecord label="StorageClass:ceph"] + sc + } + { + node [shape=point] + p0 p1 p2 + p3 p4 p5 + } + subgraph clusterSDC { + label="SDC" + PVC0 + PVC1 + } + subgraph clusterSDNC { + label="SDNC" + PVC2 + } + subgraph clusterSO { + label="SO" + PVCn + } + PV0 -> sc + PV1 -> sc + PV2 -> sc + PVn -> sc + + sc -> {D0 D1 Dx} + PVC0 -> PV0 + PVC1 -> PV1 + PVC2 -> PV2 + PVCn -> PVn + + # force all of these nodes to the same line in the given order + subgraph { + rank = same; PV0;PV1;PV2;PVn;p0;p1;p2 + PV0->PV1->PV2->p0->p1->p2->PVn [style=invis] + } + + subgraph { + rank = same; D0;D1;Dx;p3;p4;p5 + D0->D1->p3->p4->p5->Dx [style=invis] + } + + } + +In-order for an ONAP component to use a persistent volume it must make a claim +against a specific persistent volume defined in the ONAP common charts. Note +that there is a one-to-one relationship between a PVC and PV. The following is +an excerpt from a component chart that defines a PVC: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + Insert PVC example here + +OOM Networking with Kubernetes +------------------------------ + +- DNS +- Ports - Flattening the containers also expose port conflicts between the containers which need to be resolved. + +Node Ports +~~~~~~~~~~ + +Pod Placement Rules +------------------- +OOM will use the rich set of Kubernetes node and pod affinity / +anti-affinity rules to minimize the chance of a single failure resulting in a +loss of ONAP service. Node affinity / anti-affinity is used to guide the +Kubernetes orchestrator in the placement of pods on nodes (physical or virtual +machines). For example: + +- if a container used Intel DPDK technology the pod may state that it as + affinity to an Intel processor based node, or +- geographical based node labels (such as the Kubernetes standard zone or + region labels) may be used to ensure placement of a DCAE complex close to the + VNFs generating high volumes of traffic thus minimizing networking cost. + Specifically, if nodes were pre-assigned labels East and West, the pod + deployment spec to distribute pods to these nodes would be: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + nodeSelector: + failure-domain.beta.Kubernetes.io/region: {{ .Values.location }} + +- "location: West" is specified in the values.yaml file used to deploy + one DCAE cluster and "location: East" is specified in a second values.yaml + file (see OOM Configuration Management for more information about + configuration files like the values.yamlfile). + +Node affinity can also be used to achieve geographic redundancy if pods are +assigned to multiple failure domains. For more information refer to `Assigning +Pods to Nodes`_. + +.. note:: + One could use Pod to Node assignment to totally constrain Kubernetes when + doing initial container assignment to replicate the Amsterdam release + OpenStack Heat based deployment. Should one wish to do this, each VM would + need a unique node name which would be used to specify a node constaint + for every component. These assignment could be specified in an environment + specific values.yaml file. Constraining Kubernetes in this way is not + recommended. + +Kubernetes has a comprehensive system called Taints and Tolerations that can be +used to force the container orchestrator to repel pods from nodes based on +static events (an administrator assigning a taint to a node) or dynamic events +(such as a node becoming unreachable or running out of disk space). There are +no plans to use taints or tolerations in the ONAP Beijing release. Pod +affinity / anti-affinity is the concept of creating a spacial relationship +between pods when the Kubernetes orchestrator does assignment (both initially +an in operation) to nodes as explained in Inter-pod affinity and anti-affinity. +For example, one might choose to co-located all of the ONAP SDC containers on a +single node as they are not critical runtime components and co-location +minimizes overhead. On the other hand, one might choose to ensure that all of +the containers in an ODL cluster (SDNC and APPC) are placed on separate nodes +such that a node failure has minimal impact to the operation of the cluster. +An example of how pod affinity / anti-affinity is shown below: + +Pod Affinity / Anti-Affinity + +.. code-block:: yaml + + apiVersion: v1 + kind: Pod + metadata: + name: with-pod-affinity + spec: + affinity: + podAffinity: + requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: + - labelSelector: + matchExpressions: + - key: security + operator: In + values: + - S1 + topologyKey: failure-domain.beta.Kubernetes.io/zone + podAntiAffinity: + preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution: + - weight: 100 + podAffinityTerm: + labelSelector: + matchExpressions: + - key: security + operator: In + values: + - S2 + topologyKey: Kubernetes.io/hostname + containers: + - name: with-pod-affinity + image: gcr.io/google_containers/pause:2.0 + +This example contains both podAffinity and podAntiAffinity rules, the first +rule is is a must (requiredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution) while the +second will be met pending other considerations +(preferredDuringSchedulingIgnoredDuringExecution). Preemption Another feature +that may assist in achieving a repeatable deployment in the presence of faults +that may have reduced the capacity of the cloud is assigning priority to the +containers such that mission critical components have the ability to evict less +critical components. Kubernetes provides this capability with Pod Priority and +Preemption. Prior to having more advanced production grade features available, +the ability to at least be able to re-deploy ONAP (or a subset of) reliably +provides a level of confidence that should an outage occur the system can be +brought back on-line predictably. + +Health Checks +------------- + +Monitoring of ONAP components is configured in the agents within JSON files and +stored in gerrit under the consul-agent-config, here is an example from the AAI +model loader (aai-model-loader-health.json): + +.. code-block:: json + + { + "service": { + "name": "A&AI Model Loader", + "checks": [ + { + "id": "model-loader-process", + "name": "Model Loader Presence", + "script": "/consul/config/scripts/model-loader-script.sh", + "interval": "15s", + "timeout": "1s" + } + ] + } + } + +Liveness Probes +--------------- + +These liveness probes can simply check that a port is available, that a +built-in health check is reporting good health, or that the Consul health check +is positive. For example, to monitor the SDNC component has following liveness +probe can be found in the SDNC DB deployment specification: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + sdnc db liveness probe + + livenessProbe: + exec: + command: ["mysqladmin", "ping"] + initialDelaySeconds: 30 periodSeconds: 10 + timeoutSeconds: 5 + +The 'initialDelaySeconds' control the period of time between the readiness +probe succeeding and the liveness probe starting. 'periodSeconds' and +'timeoutSeconds' control the actual operation of the probe. Note that +containers are inherently ephemeral so the healing action destroys failed +containers and any state information within it. To avoid a loss of state, a +persistent volume should be used to store all data that needs to be persisted +over the re-creation of a container. Persistent volumes have been created for +the database components of each of the projects and the same technique can be +used for all persistent state information. + + +Configuration Management +======================== + +ONAP is a large system composed of many components - each of which are complex +systems in themselves - that needs to be deployed in a number of different +ways. For example, within a single operator's network there may be R&D +deployments under active development, pre-production versions undergoing system +testing and production systems that are operating live networks. Each of these +deployments will differ in significant ways, such as the version of the +software images deployed. In addition, there may be a number of application +specific configuration differences, such as operating system environment +variables. The following describes how the Helm configuration management +system is used within the OOM project to manage both ONAP infrastructure +configuration as well as ONAP components configuration. + +One of the artifacts that OOM/Kubernetes uses to deploy ONAP components is the +deployment specification, yet another yaml file. Within these deployment specs +are a number of parameters as shown in the following mariadb example: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 + kind: Deployment + metadata: + name: mariadb + spec: + <...> + template: + <...> + spec: + hostname: mariadb + containers: + - args: + image: nexus3.onap.org:10001/mariadb:10.1.11 + name: "mariadb" + env: + - name: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD + value: password + - name: MARIADB_MAJOR + value: "10.1" + <...> + imagePullSecrets: + - name: onap-docker-registry-key + +Note that within the deployment specification, one of the container arguments +is the key/value pair image: nexus3.onap.org:10001/mariadb:10.1.11 which +specifies the version of the mariadb software to deploy. Although the +deployment specifications greatly simplify deployment, maintenance of the +deployment specifications themselves become problematic as software versions +change over time or as different versions are required for different +deployments. For example, if the R&D team needs to deploy a newer version of +mariadb than what is currently used in the production environment, they would +need to clone the deployment specification and change this value. Fortunately, +this problem has been solved with the templating capabilities of Helm. + +The following example shows how the deployment specifications are modified to +incorporate Helm templates such that key/value pairs can be defined outside of +the deployment specifications and passed during instantiation of the component. + +.. code-block:: yaml + + apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 + kind: Deployment + metadata: + name: mariadb + namespace: "{{ .Values.nsPrefix }}-mso" + spec: + <...> + template: + <...> + spec: + hostname: mariadb + containers: + - args: + image: {{ .Values.image.mariadb }} + imagePullPolicy: {{ .Values.pullPolicy }} + name: "mariadb" + env: + - name: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD + value: password + - name: MARIADB_MAJOR + value: "10.1" + <...> + imagePullSecrets: + - name: "{{ .Values.nsPrefix }}-docker-registry-key"apiVersion: extensions/v1beta1 + kind: Deployment + metadata: + name: mariadb + namespace: "{{ .Values.nsPrefix }}-mso" + spec: + <...> + template: + <...> + spec: + hostname: mariadb + containers: + - args: + image: {{ .Values.image.mariadb }} + imagePullPolicy: {{ .Values.pullPolicy }} + name: "mariadb" + env: + - name: MYSQL_ROOT_PASSWORD + value: password + - name: MARIADB_MAJOR + value: "10.1" + <...> + imagePullSecrets: + - name: "{{ .Values.nsPrefix }}-docker-registry-key" + +This version of the deployment specification has gone through the process of +templating values that are likely to change between deployments. Note that the +image is now specified as: image: {{ .Values.image.mariadb }} instead of a +string used previously. During the deployment phase, Helm (actually the Helm +sub-component Tiller) substitutes the {{ .. }} entries with a variable defined +in a values.yaml file. The content of this file is as follows: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + nsPrefix: onap + pullPolicy: IfNotPresent + image: + readiness: oomk8s/readiness-check:1.0.0 + mso: nexus3.onap.org:10001/openecomp/mso:1.0-STAGING-latest + mariadb: nexus3.onap.org:10001/mariadb:10.1.11 + +Within the values.yaml file there is an image section with the key/value pair +mariadb: nexus3.onap.org:10001/mariadb:10.1.11 which is the same value used in +the non-templated version. Once all of the substitutions are complete, the +resulting deployment specification ready to be used by Kubernetes. + +Also note that in this example, the namespace key/value pair is specified in +the values.yaml file. This key/value pair will be global across the entire +ONAP deployment and is therefore a prime example of where configuration +hierarchy can be very useful. + +When creating a deployment template consider the use of default values if +appropriate. Helm templating has built in support for DEFAULT values, here is +an example: + +.. code-block:: yaml + + imagePullSecrets: + - name: "{{ .Values.nsPrefix | default "onap" }}-docker-registry-key" + +The pipeline operator ("|") used here hints at that power of Helm templates in +that much like an operating system command line the pipeline operator allow +over 60 Helm functions to be embedded directly into the template (note that the +Helm template language is a superset of the Go template language). These +functions include simple string operations like upper and more complex flow +control operations like if/else. + + +ONAP Application Configuration +------------------------------ + +Environment Files +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +MSB Integration +=============== +.. MISC +.. ==== +.. Note that although OOM uses Kubernetes facilities to minimize the effort +.. required of the ONAP component owners to implement a successful rolling upgrade +.. strategy there are other considerations that must be taken into consideration. +.. For example, external APIs - both internal and external to ONAP - should be +.. designed to gracefully accept transactions from a peer at a different software +.. version to avoid deadlock situations. Embedded version codes in messages may +.. facilitate such capabilities. +.. +.. Within each of the projects a new configuration repository contains all of the +.. project specific configuration artifacts. As changes are made within the +.. project, it's the responsibility of the project team to make appropriate +.. changes to the configuration data. |