5.0.0 policy-handler - new PDP API or old PDP API4.0.0-ONAPdublin

- in R4 Dublin the policy-engine introduced a totally new API
- policy-handler now has a startup option to either use the new PDP API
  or the old PDP API that was created-updated before the end of 2018
- see README.md and README_pdp_api_v0.md for instructions on how to
  setup the policy-handler running either with the new PDP API
  or the old (pdp_api_v0) PDP API
- this is a massive refactoring that changed almost all the source files,
  but kept the old logic when using the old (pdp_api_v0) PDP API
- all the code related to PDP API version is split into two subfolders
  = pdp_api/ contains the new PDP API source code
  = pdp_api_v0/ contains the old (2018) PDP API source code
  = pdp_client.py imports from either pdp_api or pdp_api_v0
  = the rest of the code is only affected when it needs to branch
    the logic
- logging to policy_handler.log now shows the path of the source file to
  allow tracing which PDP API is actually used
- when the new PDP API is used, the policy-update flow is disabled
  = passive mode of operation
  = no web-socket
  = no periodic catch_up
  = no policy-filters
  = reduced web-API - only a single /policy_latest endpoint is available
    /policies_latest returns 404
    /catch_up request is accepted, but ignored
- on new PDP API: http /policy_latest returns the new data from the
  new PDP API with the following fields added by the policy-handler
  to keep other policy related parts intact in R4
  (see pdp_api/policy_utils.py)
  = "policyName" = policy_id + "." + "policyVersion" + ".xml"
  = "policyVersion" = str("metadata"."policy-version")
  = "config" - is the renamed "properties" from the new PDP API response
- unit tests are split into two subfolders as well
  = main/ for the new PDP API testing
  = pdp_api_v0/ for the old (2018) PDP API
- removed the following line from the license text of changed files
  ECOMP is a trademark and service mark of AT&T Intellectual Property.

- the new PDP API is expected to be extended and redesigned in R5 El Alto
- on retiring the old PDP API - the intention is to be able to remove
  the pdp_api_v0/ subfolder and minimal related cleanup of the code
  that imports that as well as the cleanup of the config.py, etc.

Change-Id: Ief9a2ae4541300308caaf97377f4ed051535dbe4
Signed-off-by: Alex Shatov <alexs@att.com>
Issue-ID: DCAEGEN2-1128

1 files changed, 107 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/tests/pdp_api_v0/test_pz_catch_up.py b/tests/pdp_api_v0/test_pz_catch_up.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3b37af5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/pdp_api_v0/test_pz_catch_up.py
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# ============LICENSE_START=======================================================
+# Copyright (c) 2018-2019 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
+# ================================================================================
+# Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+# you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+# You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+#      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+# ============LICENSE_END=========================================================
+#
+"""test policy catch_up methods directly"""
+
+import json
+import time
+
+import pytest
+
+from policyhandler.config import Config
+from policyhandler.onap.audit import Audit
+from policyhandler.policy_receiver import PolicyReceiver
+from policyhandler.utils import Utils
+
+from ..mock_tracker import Tracker
+
+_LOGGER = Utils.get_logger(__file__)
+
+@pytest.mark.usefixtures(
+    "fix_pdp_api_v0",
+    "fix_auto_catch_up",
+    "fix_discovery",
+    "fix_pdp_post_big",
+    "fix_deploy_handler_413",
+    "fix_policy_receiver_websocket"
+)
+def test_catch_up_failed_dh():
+    """test run policy handler with catchups and failed deployment-handler"""
+    if Config.is_pdp_api_default():
+        _LOGGER.info("passive for new PDP API")
+        return
+
+    _LOGGER.info("start test_catch_up_failed_dh")
+    assert not PolicyReceiver.is_running()
+    audit = Audit(job_name="test_catch_up_failed_dh",
+                  req_message="start test_catch_up_failed_dh")
+    PolicyReceiver.run(audit)
+
+    _LOGGER.info("sleep 12 before shutdown...")
+    time.sleep(12)
+
+    health = audit.health(full=True)
+    audit.audit_done(result=json.dumps(health))
+
+    _LOGGER.info("healthcheck: %s", json.dumps(health))
+    assert bool(health)
+
+    PolicyReceiver.shutdown(audit)
+    time.sleep(1)
+    assert not PolicyReceiver.is_running()
+
+    health = audit.health(full=True)
+    _LOGGER.info("healthcheck: %s", json.dumps(health))
+
+    Tracker.validate()
+
+@pytest.mark.usefixtures(
+    "fix_pdp_api_v0",
+    "fix_auto_catch_up",
+    "fix_discovery",
+    "fix_pdp_post",
+    "fix_deploy_handler_404",
+    "fix_policy_receiver_websocket"
+)
+def test_catch_up_dh_404():
+    """test run policy handler with catchups and failed deployment-handler"""
+    if Config.is_pdp_api_default():
+        _LOGGER.info("passive for new PDP API")
+        return
+
+    _LOGGER.info("start test_catch_up_dh_404")
+    assert not PolicyReceiver.is_running()
+    audit = Audit(job_name="test_catch_up_dh_404",
+                  req_message="start test_catch_up_dh_404")
+    PolicyReceiver.run(audit)
+
+    _LOGGER.info("sleep 12 before shutdown...")
+    time.sleep(12)
+
+    health = audit.health(full=True)
+    audit.audit_done(result=json.dumps(health))
+
+    _LOGGER.info("healthcheck: %s", json.dumps(health))
+    assert bool(health)
+
+    PolicyReceiver.shutdown(audit)
+    time.sleep(1)
+    assert not PolicyReceiver.is_running()
+
+    health = audit.health(full=True)
+    _LOGGER.info("healthcheck: %s", json.dumps(health))
+
+    Tracker.validate()