1 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sli/provider/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint/sli-blueprint.xml b/sli/provider/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint/sli-blueprint.xml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fb3ab9a03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sli/provider/src/main/resources/OSGI-INF/blueprint/sli-blueprint.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
+<blueprint xmlns="http://www.osgi.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
+           xmlns:odl="http://opendaylight.org/xmlns/blueprint/v1.0.0"
+           odl:use-default-for-reference-types="true">
+
+    <bean id="propProvider" class="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.provider.SvcLogicPropertiesProviderImpl" />
+    <reference id="dblibService" interface="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.dblib.DbLibService" />
+    <bean id="svcLogicClassResolver" class="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.provider.SvcLogicClassResolver" />
+
+    <bean id="svcLogicService" class="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.provider.SvcLogicServiceImpl">
+        <argument ref="propProvider" />
+        <argument ref="dblibService" />
+        <argument ref="svcLogicClassResolver" />
+    </bean>
+
+    <service ref="svcLogicService">
+        <interfaces>
+            <value>org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.provider.SvcLogicService</value>
+        </interfaces>
+    </service>
+
+    <bean id="fileRecorder" class="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.recording.FileRecorder" />
+    <!-- Implementation name was chosen over interface name due to the fact that this Service
+         was previously registered using the implementation name rather than the interface name.
+         To ensure backwards compatibility with abstractions polling the Service Registry for the
+         fileRecorder, the implementation name was chosen here. -->
+    <service ref="fileRecorder" interface="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.recording.FileRecorder" />
+
+    <bean id="slf4jRecorder" class="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.recording.Slf4jRecorder" />
+    <!-- Implementation name was chosen over interface name due to the fact that this Service
+         was previously registered using the implementation name rather than the interface name.
+         To ensure backwards compatibility with abstractions polling the Service Registry for the
+         slf4jRecorder, the implementation name was chosen here. -->
+    <service ref="slf4jRecorder" interface="org.onap.ccsdk.sli.core.sli.recording.Slf4jRecorder" />
+
+</blueprint>