Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
- Use STAX API for XML processing instead of parsing it manually
- Rearrange code for clarity and testing
- Adjust JUnits accordingly
Issue-ID: APPC-1024
Change-Id: I9d655b581adb401b0c20bc29eda6a2bce1f2ef89
Signed-off-by: Joanna Jeremicz <joanna.jeremicz@nokia.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iacc5d38bacc946cf203d690cbe5a174e6dab15e2
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I4d035ffb81367fd4de4004d4aefa8a6433e4fd7d
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: If9a93361b275df98412dc23410a2094e340b7c9c
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: If2320397a735dd4f510350802df631cb132145e8
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I309985d0b7d9cbfa60d3e1082afd84aaf9631ef1
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ief0a74d2132295258c1a198309e310c235cad923
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
SingleFeatureTest results in ClassNotFoundException: ResolutionException
(no security manage: RMI class loader disabled)
Change-Id: I58ac5947557276ccc0c7add7cb4c9394418cfa26
Signed-off-by: Ryan Young <ry303t@att.com>
Issue-ID: APPC-1045
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I2a16e144489647a011735bad462665690eeba368
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iebffd1a614c286f50fca9b3159107d6e08a06670
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Icf3522dee487c4ab876e11f201ad160c6be3831d
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I4b0f1f352fa8b90810b7efc145e83edebff913da
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ibbafa33ed726dff65cbc3528bf09d9cf68d97eb3
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
updated existing test case to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I3cec480ee68d5dc1aefd1aa8760ca70b485845b4
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I27a84f312fcdaed2ff85c686d2fa2e39884b6224
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Code Coverage for appc-Inbound/InterfaceServices
Issue-ID: APPC-1132
Change-Id: Idd36429115f2d324fded4ab4106226cfad33bb65
Signed-off-by: Dilip kumar Pampana <dilip.kumar.pampana@ibm.com>
|
|
The changes between patch 3 and patch 4 of this commit
https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/55093, where the parameters
are sent to the SvcLogicContext instead of values, breaks
the save functionality in cdt. When SvcLogicContext is
allowed to subsitute the values, the StringUtils.isEmpty
functions are skipped over.
Although it appears this change is changing a parameterized
query to a static statement query, in fact the query is not
parameterized in its current form either. In its current form,
SvcLogicContext is just subsituting the values into a static
statement query. SvcLogicContext does perform a simple single
quote escape, which could be duplicated here.
Change-Id: If3ffceed5ad147c402355ffef17a8abf0752d5b1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Brady <pb071s@att.com>
Issue-ID: APPC-1107
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ie87a796113a818a2454f8f2e339563ac062ee627
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I5af628ec75f5dc16eac289fcaae4d62456b3edb0
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I74760fd2d97c4ef429e5f9d6f6eff0297ccec17e
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I00237d24ef2fac893e7c1867e4aa38ba026e9a16
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iba603fd695d9f5e2a70fa08f07272e407d0db00c
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Added comment and used String instead of Integer.toString
Change-Id: I07a0a7752b225fbf50d761b489b9320b47fcc71d
Issue-ID: APPC-1013
Signed-off-by: sb8915 <sb8915@att.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Id3d7d93fb02d62be8288ae7065b69b22ce1d8c2f
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
updated existing test case to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iea8d0a833872cec864436300c4bcbc9e55cd3316
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
updated test to cover getAppcTimeStampResponse method in
DbResponseProcessor.java
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I6333683181498857aa58ca7ccb404329574513ff
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ic13af8abd0b984111cec2b8b4c822ea0f85c6286
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
fixed the issue APPC-1112, where few test cases where failing because of
platform dependency. Removed assertEquals and replaced it with
assertNotNull and assertTrue, so that coverage is not affected and the
test case also passes succesfully. Cant use asserEquals here as the
value timestamp is platform dependent.
Issue-ID: APPC-1112
Change-Id: I4b9f786eaa61835765ffdadd0beb9092bc9beb17
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I230ad0e38a1507e0619d490a3786b97fa6d5db32
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I99d9a92e458a1e4066c7abe2d6595d1ce6c7b946
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Please refer to Jira page for more details
Issue-ID: APPC-1115
Change-Id: I0f56009a44b37e0f30942da533f8bc08766de602
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Chandrasekaran <ganesh.c@samsung.com>
|
|
Please refer to the Jira page for more information.
Issue-ID: APPC-1114
Change-Id: I6c0f033594371c33efd9ab224873c7f9cbec0f2e
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Chandrasekaran <ganesh.c@samsung.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I35d44cf74166edd126b918b0624a99ebc0396b07
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Added new test class files for code coverage of DesignDBServices and
removed version for mockito-core as it is overriding existing one in
pom.xml file in design services provide.
Issue-ID: APPC-1117
Change-Id: I9eddf30c7e3c72467f4bf5f5850c22c083f51a9f
Signed-off-by: Dilip kumar Pampana <dilip.kumar.pampana@ibm.com>
|
|
ignoring the testFetch method as it is taking 130 sec to execute, as
reported by Patrick in the issue APPC-1111.
Issue-ID: APPC-1111
Change-Id: I7bef0719a04b5d3dd9d52a1c2608f16f16d76c5d
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: APPC-1113
Change-Id: If7f466c6e6c205c220ae020c3e4ce24e1088f7f3
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Chandrasekaran <ganesh.c@samsung.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ia82129b891a518e6dfa1809ab94f308775d29a9c
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iaca5e351a38e37bd6310e191c3515d2d24789858
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ib1327bea47d5feb6fa7d5a2ad5bdb136642661b1
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I7cb23c2e389a8c0d8d153cb241b726360a759f03
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Id2a2f7f2476f4a6d2f917c713af374cd0d02f682
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ie0a570c7b20d236d8203d57f1351f34e0b7466d1
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
addes test case to increase code-coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ie36b332e947900990d62a11723070a5ae8e53a99
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: I9ddee44a33daa768a73e7575ac5901b13e87237b
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
to increase code-coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iabee69884c983ff3391d682d185524a22ea08ab0
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
Issue-ID: APPC-1097
Change-Id: Ic9baa3e43be55bc20aa974898c164cc8a590a78a
Signed-off-by: Ganesh Chandrasekaran <ganesh.c@samsung.com>
|
|
added test case to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Iad87297e2f52c7a14bfa178ab6be4a841604715d
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
In R3, AT&T contributes a new lcm api: reboot
this is for adding reboot LCM API into readdoc
Change-Id: I3bb9e338d78424005aa6b1584073db101ae7f337
Issue-ID: APPC-1034
Signed-off-by: Taka Cho <tc012c@att.com>
|
|
added test case to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ib2bb400348ebde7200d46e1f05775be6fbe298cd
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|
|
added test case to increase code coverage
Issue-ID: APPC-1086
Change-Id: Ib02211122e9d662387858c70876f3784e65ec0ce
Signed-off-by: Sandeep J <sandeejh@in.ibm.com>
|