summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java')
-rw-r--r--appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java384
1 files changed, 192 insertions, 192 deletions
diff --git a/appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java b/appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java
index d652c7523..1ab1e4ef9 100644
--- a/appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java
+++ b/appc-dispatcher/appc-dispatcher-common/lock-manager-lib/lock-manager-impl/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/lockmanager/impl/sql/optimistic/TestMySqlLockManager.java
@@ -35,196 +35,196 @@ import java.util.concurrent.*;
public class TestMySqlLockManager extends MySqlLockManagerBaseTests {
- @Override
- protected JdbcLockManager createJdbcLockManager(boolean useReal) {
- return new MySqlLockManagerMock(useReal);
- }
-
- @Test
- public void testConcurrentLockDifferentOwners() throws LockException, InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
-
- final int participantsNo = 2;
- Synchronizer synchronizer = new Synchronizer(participantsNo) {
-
- private boolean wait = true;
-
- @Override
- public void preAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- if(Owner.A.name().equals(owner)) {
- synchronized(this) {
- if(wait) {
- waitOn(this);
- }
- }
- }
- }
-
- @Override
- public void postAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- if(!Owner.A.name().equals(owner)) {
- synchronized(this) {
- notifyAll();
- wait = false;
- }
- }
- }
-
- @Override
- public void preUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- preAddLockRecord(resource, owner);
- }
-
- @Override
- public void postUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- postAddLockRecord(resource, owner);
- }
- };
- if(!setSynchronizer(synchronizer)) {
- return;
- }
- ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(participantsNo);
- // acquireLock by owner A should fail as it will wait for acquireLock by owner B
- Future<Boolean> future1 = executor.submit(new Callable<Boolean>() {
- @Override
- public Boolean call() throws Exception {
- try {
- lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
- return false;
- } catch(LockException e) {
- // this call should fail as Synchronizer delays its lock to make sure the second call locks the resource first
- Assert.assertEquals("Cannot lock resource [" + Resource.Resource1.name() + "] for [" + Owner.A.name() + "]: already locked by [" + Owner.B.name() + "]", e.getMessage());
- return true;
- }
- }
- });
- try {
- // acquireLock by owner B should success
- Future<Boolean> future2 = executor.submit(new Callable<Boolean>() {
- @Override
- public Boolean call() throws Exception {
- // this call should success as Synchronizer delays the above lock to make sure this call success to lock the resource
- return lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.B.name());
- }
- });
- try {
- Assert.assertTrue(future2.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
- Assert.assertTrue(future1.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
- } finally {
- future2.cancel(true);
- }
- } finally {
- future1.cancel(true);
- }
- }
-
- @Test
- public void testConcurrentLockSameOwner() throws LockException, InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
- final int participantsNo = 2;
- Synchronizer synchronizer = new Synchronizer(participantsNo) {
-
- private boolean wait = true;
-
- @Override
- public void preAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- synchronized(this) {
- if(wait) {
- wait = false;
- waitOn(this);
- }
- }
- }
-
- @Override
- public void postAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- synchronized(this) {
- notifyAll();
- }
- }
- };
- if(!setSynchronizer(synchronizer)) {
- return;
- }
- ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(participantsNo);
- // one acquireLock should return true and the other should return false
- Callable<Boolean> callable = new Callable<Boolean>() {
- @Override
- public Boolean call() throws Exception {
- return lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
- }
- };
- Future<Boolean> future1 = executor.submit(callable);
- try {
- Future<Boolean> future2 = executor.submit(callable);
- try {
- boolean future1Res = future1.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
- boolean future2Res = future2.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
- // one of the lock requests should return true, the other one false as lock is requested simultaneously from 2 threads by same owner
- Assert.assertNotEquals(future1Res, future2Res);
- } finally {
- future2.cancel(true);
- }
- } finally {
- future1.cancel(true);
- }
- }
-
- @Test
- public void testConcurrentUnlockSameOwner() throws LockException, InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
- lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
- final int participantsNo = 2;
- Synchronizer synchronizer = new Synchronizer(participantsNo) {
-
- private boolean wait = true;
-
- @Override
- public void preUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- synchronized(this) {
- // make sure second call updates the LockRecord first
- if(wait) {
- wait = false;
- waitOn(this);
- }
- }
- }
-
- @Override
- public void postUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
- synchronized(this) {
- notifyAll();
- }
- }
- };
- if(!setSynchronizer(synchronizer)) {
- return;
- }
- ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(participantsNo);
- Callable<Boolean> callable = new Callable<Boolean>() {
- @Override
- public Boolean call() throws Exception {
- try {
- lockManager.releaseLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
- // one of the unlock calls should success
- return true;
- } catch(LockException e) {
- // one of the unlock calls should throw the LockException as the resource should already be unlocked by other call
- Assert.assertEquals("Error unlocking resource [" + Resource.Resource1.name() + "]: resource is not locked", e.getMessage());
- return false;
- }
- }
- };
- Future<Boolean> future1 = executor.submit(callable);
- try {
- Future<Boolean> future2 = executor.submit(callable);
- try {
- boolean future1Res = future1.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
- boolean future2Res = future2.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
- // one of the unlock calls should return true, the other one false as unlock is requested simultaneously from 2 threads by same owner
- Assert.assertNotEquals(future1Res, future2Res);
- } finally {
- future2.cancel(true);
- }
- } finally {
- future1.cancel(true);
- }
- }
+ @Override
+ protected JdbcLockManager createJdbcLockManager(boolean useReal) {
+ return new MySqlLockManagerMock(useReal);
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testConcurrentLockDifferentOwners() throws LockException, InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
+
+ final int participantsNo = 2;
+ Synchronizer synchronizer = new Synchronizer(participantsNo) {
+
+ private boolean wait = true;
+
+ @Override
+ public void preAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ if(Owner.A.name().equals(owner)) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ if(wait) {
+ waitOn(this);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void postAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ if(!Owner.A.name().equals(owner)) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ notifyAll();
+ wait = false;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void preUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ preAddLockRecord(resource, owner);
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void postUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ postAddLockRecord(resource, owner);
+ }
+ };
+ if(!setSynchronizer(synchronizer)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(participantsNo);
+ // acquireLock by owner A should fail as it will wait for acquireLock by owner B
+ Future<Boolean> future1 = executor.submit(new Callable<Boolean>() {
+ @Override
+ public Boolean call() throws Exception {
+ try {
+ lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
+ return false;
+ } catch(LockException e) {
+ // this call should fail as Synchronizer delays its lock to make sure the second call locks the resource first
+ Assert.assertEquals("VNF : [" + Resource.Resource1.name() + "] is locked by request id : [" + Owner.B.name() + "]", e.getMessage());
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ });
+ try {
+ // acquireLock by owner B should success
+ Future<Boolean> future2 = executor.submit(new Callable<Boolean>() {
+ @Override
+ public Boolean call() throws Exception {
+ // this call should success as Synchronizer delays the above lock to make sure this call success to lock the resource
+ return lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.B.name());
+ }
+ });
+ try {
+ Assert.assertTrue(future2.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
+ Assert.assertTrue(future1.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS));
+ } finally {
+ future2.cancel(true);
+ }
+ } finally {
+ future1.cancel(true);
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testConcurrentLockSameOwner() throws LockException, InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
+ final int participantsNo = 2;
+ Synchronizer synchronizer = new Synchronizer(participantsNo) {
+
+ private boolean wait = true;
+
+ @Override
+ public void preAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ if(wait) {
+ wait = false;
+ waitOn(this);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void postAddLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ notifyAll();
+ }
+ }
+ };
+ if(!setSynchronizer(synchronizer)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(participantsNo);
+ // one acquireLock should return true and the other should return false
+ Callable<Boolean> callable = new Callable<Boolean>() {
+ @Override
+ public Boolean call() throws Exception {
+ return lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
+ }
+ };
+ Future<Boolean> future1 = executor.submit(callable);
+ try {
+ Future<Boolean> future2 = executor.submit(callable);
+ try {
+ boolean future1Res = future1.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ boolean future2Res = future2.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ // one of the lock requests should return true, the other one false as lock is requested simultaneously from 2 threads by same owner
+ Assert.assertNotEquals(future1Res, future2Res);
+ } finally {
+ future2.cancel(true);
+ }
+ } finally {
+ future1.cancel(true);
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Test
+ public void testConcurrentUnlockSameOwner() throws LockException, InterruptedException, ExecutionException, TimeoutException {
+ lockManager.acquireLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
+ final int participantsNo = 2;
+ Synchronizer synchronizer = new Synchronizer(participantsNo) {
+
+ private boolean wait = true;
+
+ @Override
+ public void preUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ // make sure second call updates the LockRecord first
+ if(wait) {
+ wait = false;
+ waitOn(this);
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ @Override
+ public void postUpdateLockRecord(String resource, String owner) {
+ synchronized(this) {
+ notifyAll();
+ }
+ }
+ };
+ if(!setSynchronizer(synchronizer)) {
+ return;
+ }
+ ExecutorService executor = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(participantsNo);
+ Callable<Boolean> callable = new Callable<Boolean>() {
+ @Override
+ public Boolean call() throws Exception {
+ try {
+ lockManager.releaseLock(Resource.Resource1.name(), Owner.A.name());
+ // one of the unlock calls should success
+ return true;
+ } catch(LockException e) {
+ // one of the unlock calls should throw the LockException as the resource should already be unlocked by other call
+ Assert.assertEquals("Error unlocking resource [" + Resource.Resource1.name() + "]: resource is not locked", e.getMessage());
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+ };
+ Future<Boolean> future1 = executor.submit(callable);
+ try {
+ Future<Boolean> future2 = executor.submit(callable);
+ try {
+ boolean future1Res = future1.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ boolean future2Res = future2.get(CONCURRENT_TEST_WAIT_TIME, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
+ // one of the unlock calls should return true, the other one false as unlock is requested simultaneously from 2 threads by same owner
+ Assert.assertNotEquals(future1Res, future2Res);
+ } finally {
+ future2.cancel(true);
+ }
+ } finally {
+ future1.cancel(true);
+ }
+ }
}