PathContext unit tests

Improved code coverage

Change-Id: I8b7d1fe8a033bd1c4df34bdd74efc011dc130a46
Issue-ID: APPC-724
Signed-off-by: Jakub Dudycz <jakub.dudycz@nokia.com>

1 files changed, 123 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/appc-common/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/util/PathContextTest.java b/appc-common/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/util/PathContextTest.java
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e075381a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/appc-common/src/test/java/org/onap/appc/util/PathContextTest.java
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/*-
+ * ============LICENSE_START=======================================================
+ * ONAP : APPC
+ * ================================================================================
+ * Copyright (C) 2017 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved.
+ * ================================================================================
+ * Copyright (C) 2018 Nokia Solutions and Networks
+ * =============================================================================
+ * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
+ * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
+ * You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ * 
+ *      http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ * 
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ * 
+ * ECOMP is a trademark and service mark of AT&T Intellectual Property.
+ * ============LICENSE_END=========================================================
+ */
+package org.onap.appc.util;
+
+import static org.junit.Assert.*;
+
+import java.util.Map;
+import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Test;
+
+public class PathContextTest {
+
+    private PathContext pathContext;
+
+    @Before
+    public void setup() {
+        pathContext = new PathContext();
+    }
+
+    @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
+    public void should_throw_exception_when_pushed_null_token() {
+        pathContext.pushToken(null);
+    }
+
+    @Test(expected = IllegalStateException.class)
+    public void should_throw_exception_when_popped_token_from_empty_path() {
+        pathContext.popToken();
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void should_delimit_tokens_with_dot() {
+        pathContext.pushToken("test");
+        pathContext.pushToken("token");
+
+        assertEquals("test.token", pathContext.getPath());
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void should_pop_tokens() {
+        pathContext.pushToken("test");
+        pathContext.pushToken("token");
+        pathContext.pushToken("token2");
+
+        pathContext.popToken();
+
+        assertEquals("test.token", pathContext.getPath());
+    }
+
+    @Test(expected = IllegalArgumentException.class)
+    public void should_throw_exception_when_pushed_null_modifier() {
+        pathContext.pushModifier(null);
+    }
+
+    @Test(expected = IllegalStateException.class)
+    public void should_throw_exception_when_popped_modifier_from_empty_path() {
+        pathContext.popModifier();
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void should_not_delimit_modifiers() {
+        pathContext.pushModifier("test");
+        pathContext.pushModifier("modifier");
+
+        assertEquals("testmodifier", pathContext.getPath());
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void should_pop_modifiers() {
+        pathContext.pushModifier("test");
+        pathContext.pushModifier("modifier");
+        pathContext.pushModifier("modifier2");
+
+        pathContext.popModifier();
+
+        assertEquals("testmodifier", pathContext.getPath());
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void should_pop_modifiers_and_tokens() {
+        pathContext.pushModifier("test");
+        pathContext.pushModifier("modifier");
+        pathContext.pushToken("token");
+
+        //TODO popToken() and popModifier() actually work the same.
+        //TODO Is there sense to keep same method under different names then?
+
+        pathContext.popToken();
+        assertEquals("testmodifier", pathContext.getPath());
+
+        pathContext.popModifier();
+        assertEquals("test", pathContext.getPath());
+    }
+
+    @Test
+    public void should_add_entries(){
+        pathContext.entry("name", "value");
+
+        Map<String, String> entries = pathContext.entries();
+        assertEquals("value", entries.get("name"));
+    }
+
+}