From d750eabf5de2423f0a7c89ffbfbcc0d65bb4623e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rob Daugherty Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 18:35:49 -0500 Subject: Clean up Process Engine selection logic Several failed attempts to split the BPMN application into multiple applications with separate camunda process engines have left a mess of confusing classes and process engine definitions. In the Amsterdam release, there should be only one BPMN application war. This is MSOInfrastructureBPMN. MSOCommonBPMN should not be deployed as a separate application. Its classes are compiled into a jar and this is included inside MSOInfrastructureBPMN. The MSOInfrastructureBPMN application should use the "default" process engine. WorkflowAsyncInfrastructureResource and MSOCommonApplication classes are not needed. Issue: SO-322 Change-Id: Ifdb3b33541346b561a16361d1aa791e8342a34fa Signed-off-by: Rob Daugherty --- .../webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml | 38 ---------------------- 1 file changed, 38 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 bpmn/MSOCommonBPMN/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml (limited to 'bpmn/MSOCommonBPMN/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml') diff --git a/bpmn/MSOCommonBPMN/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml b/bpmn/MSOCommonBPMN/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml deleted file mode 100644 index b68ebd943c..0000000000 --- a/bpmn/MSOCommonBPMN/src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jboss-deployment-structure.xml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,38 +0,0 @@ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- cgit 1.2.3-korg