From 91d04c64771832a0b8815ffbe1f0f9920320d94d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pamela Dragosh Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 19:41:00 -0500 Subject: Initial OpenECOMP policy/engine commit Change-Id: I7dbff37733b661643dd4d1caefa3d7dccc361b6e Signed-off-by: Pamela Dragosh --- .../FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest.java | 1367 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 1367 insertions(+) create mode 100644 ECOMP-TEST/src/test/java/org/openecomp/policy/pdp/test/std/functions/FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest.java (limited to 'ECOMP-TEST/src/test/java/org/openecomp/policy/pdp/test/std/functions/FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest.java') diff --git a/ECOMP-TEST/src/test/java/org/openecomp/policy/pdp/test/std/functions/FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest.java b/ECOMP-TEST/src/test/java/org/openecomp/policy/pdp/test/std/functions/FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest.java new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b5b9c1453 --- /dev/null +++ b/ECOMP-TEST/src/test/java/org/openecomp/policy/pdp/test/std/functions/FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest.java @@ -0,0 +1,1367 @@ +/*- + * ============LICENSE_START======================================================= + * ECOMP-TEST + * ================================================================================ + * Copyright (C) 2017 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. + * ================================================================================ + * Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. + * You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + * ============LICENSE_END========================================================= + */ + +package org.openecomp.policy.pdp.test.std.functions; + +import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse; +import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue; +import static org.junit.Assert.fail; + +import java.util.ArrayList; +import java.util.Calendar; +import java.util.Date; +import java.util.List; + +import org.junit.Test; + +import com.att.research.xacml.api.XACML3; +import com.att.research.xacml.std.datatypes.DataTypes; +import com.att.research.xacml.std.datatypes.ISO8601Date; +import com.att.research.xacml.std.datatypes.ISO8601DateTime; +import com.att.research.xacml.std.datatypes.ISO8601Time; +import com.att.research.xacmlatt.pdp.policy.ExpressionResult; +import com.att.research.xacmlatt.pdp.policy.FunctionArgument; +import com.att.research.xacmlatt.pdp.policy.FunctionArgumentAttributeValue; +import com.att.research.xacmlatt.pdp.std.StdFunctions; +import com.att.research.xacmlatt.pdp.std.functions.FunctionDefinitionComparison; +import com.att.research.xacmlatt.pdp.std.functions.FunctionDefinitionTimeInRange; + +/** + * Test FunctionDefinitionComparison + * + * TO RUN - use jUnit + * In Eclipse select this file or the enclosing directory, right-click and select Run As/JUnit Test + * + * + */ +public class FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest { + + /* + * variables useful in the following tests + */ + List arguments = new ArrayList(); + + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue stringAttr1 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue stringAttr1a = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue stringAttr2 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue stringAttrNeg1 = null; + + + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue intAttr1 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue intAttr1a = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue intAttr2 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue intAttr0 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue intAttrNeg1 = null; + + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attr1 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attr1a = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attr2 = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrNeg1 = null; + + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateToday = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateSameDay = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTommorrow = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateYesterday = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateWithTimeZone = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateNoTimeZone = null; + + + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrTimeToday = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrTimeSameDay = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrTimeTommorrow = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrTimeYesterday = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrTimeWithTimeZone = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrTimeNoTimeZone = null; + + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTimeToday = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTimeSameDay = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTimeTommorrow = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTimeYesterday = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTimeWithTimeZone = null; + FunctionArgumentAttributeValue attrDateTimeNoTimeZone = null; + + /** + * Set up some common variables on startup + */ + public FunctionDefinitionComparisonTest() { + try { + stringAttr1 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_STRING.createAttributeValue("abc")); + stringAttr1a = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_STRING.createAttributeValue("abc")); + stringAttr2 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_STRING.createAttributeValue("def")); + stringAttrNeg1 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_STRING.createAttributeValue("AAA")); + + + intAttr1 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.createAttributeValue(1)); + intAttr1a = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.createAttributeValue(1)); + intAttr2 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.createAttributeValue(2)); + intAttr0 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.createAttributeValue(0)); + intAttrNeg1 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.createAttributeValue(-1)); + + attr1 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.createAttributeValue(1.0)); + attr1a = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.createAttributeValue(1.0)); + attr2 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.createAttributeValue(2.4)); + attrNeg1 = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.createAttributeValue(-1.0)); + + // create dates + Calendar calendar = Calendar.getInstance(); + Date today = calendar.getTime(); + Date longAgo = new Date(1234); + // create a date that is different than "today" but within the same day (i.e. has a different hour) + if (calendar.get(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY) > 3) { + calendar.set(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY, 3); + } else { + calendar.set(Calendar.HOUR_OF_DAY, 5); + } + Date todayPlus = calendar.getTime(); + calendar.add(Calendar.DATE, 1); + Date tommorrow = calendar.getTime(); + attrDateToday = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATE.createAttributeValue(today)); + attrDateSameDay = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATE.createAttributeValue(todayPlus)); + attrDateTommorrow = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATE.createAttributeValue(tommorrow)); + attrDateYesterday = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATE.createAttributeValue(longAgo)); + ISO8601Date isoDate = new ISO8601Date(1920, 5, 8); + attrDateNoTimeZone = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATE.createAttributeValue(isoDate)); + isoDate = new ISO8601Date("GMT+00:02", 1920, 5, 8); + attrDateWithTimeZone = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATE.createAttributeValue(isoDate)); + + // create Times + ISO8601Time isoTime = new ISO8601Time(14, 43, 12, 145); + attrTimeToday = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_TIME.createAttributeValue(isoTime)); + attrTimeSameDay = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_TIME.createAttributeValue(isoTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time(18, 53, 34, 423); + attrTimeTommorrow = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_TIME.createAttributeValue(isoTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time(7, 34, 6,543); + attrTimeYesterday = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_TIME.createAttributeValue(isoTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time(12, 12, 12, 12); + attrTimeNoTimeZone = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_TIME.createAttributeValue(isoTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time("GMT:+00:03", 12, 12, 12, 12); + attrTimeWithTimeZone = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_TIME.createAttributeValue(isoTime)); + + // create DateTimes + isoDate = new ISO8601Date(1920, 5, 8); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time( 18, 53, 34, 423); + ISO8601DateTime isoDateTime = new ISO8601DateTime((String)null, 1920, 5, 8, 18, 53, 34, 423); + attrDateTimeToday = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.createAttributeValue(isoDateTime)); + attrDateTimeSameDay = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.createAttributeValue(isoDateTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time(20, 53, 34, 423); + isoDateTime = new ISO8601DateTime((String)null, 1920, 5, 8, 20, 53, 34, 423); + attrDateTimeTommorrow = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.createAttributeValue(isoDateTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time(7, 34, 6,543); + isoDateTime = new ISO8601DateTime((String)null, 1920, 5, 8, 7, 34, 6, 543); + attrDateTimeYesterday = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.createAttributeValue(isoDateTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time(12, 12, 12, 12); + isoDateTime = new ISO8601DateTime((String)null, 1920, 5, 8, 12, 12, 12, 12); + attrDateTimeNoTimeZone = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.createAttributeValue(isoDateTime)); + isoTime = new ISO8601Time("GMT:+00:03", 12, 12, 12, 12); + isoDate = new ISO8601Date("GMT:+00:03", 1920, 5, 8); + isoDateTime = new ISO8601DateTime("GMT:+00:03", 1920, 5, 8, 12, 12, 12, 12); + attrDateTimeWithTimeZone = new FunctionArgumentAttributeValue(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.createAttributeValue(isoDateTime)); + + + + + } catch (Exception e) { + fail("Error creating values e="+ e); + } + } + + /** + * String + */ + @Test + public void testString_GT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_STRING_GREATER_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_STRING_GREATER_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_STRING.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // test bad args data types? Not needed? + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + } + + @Test + public void testString_GTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_STRING_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_STRING_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_STRING.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testString_LT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_STRING_LESS_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_STRING_LESS_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_STRING.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testString_LTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_STRING_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_STRING_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_STRING.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(stringAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + + + /** + * Integer + */ + @Test + public void testInteger_GT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_INTEGER_GREATER_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_INTEGER_GREATER_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // test bad args data types? Not needed? + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + } + + @Test + public void testInteger_GTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_INTEGER_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_INTEGER_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testInteger_LT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_INTEGER_LESS_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_INTEGER_LESS_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testInteger_LTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_INTEGER_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_INTEGER_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_INTEGER.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // check first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + + + + /** + * Double + */ + @Test + public void testDouble_GT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DOUBLE_GREATER_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DOUBLE_GREATER_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // test bad args data types? Not needed? + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + + } + + @Test + public void testDouble_GTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DOUBLE_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DOUBLE_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testDouble_LT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DOUBLE_LESS_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DOUBLE_LESS_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testDouble_LTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DOUBLE_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DOUBLE_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DOUBLE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr1a); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attr2); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attr1); + arguments.add(attrNeg1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + + + /** + * Date + */ + + @Test + public void testDate_GT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATE_GREATER_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATE_GREATER_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // test bad args data types? One with TimeZone and one without + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + + // test with TimeZone vs without + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateWithTimeZone); + arguments.add(attrDateNoTimeZone); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + assertEquals("function:date-greater-than Cannot compare this ISO8601DateTime with non-time-zoned ISO8601DateTime", res.getStatus().getStatusMessage()); + assertEquals("urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:status:processing-error", res.getStatus().getStatusCode().getStatusCodeValue().stringValue()); + + + } + + @Test + public void testDate_GTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATE_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATE_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testDate_LT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATE_LESS_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATE_LESS_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testDate_LTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATE_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATE_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATE.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateToday); + arguments.add(attrDateYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + + + + + + + /** + * Time + */ + + @Test + public void testTime_GT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_TIME_GREATER_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_TIME_GREATER_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_TIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // test bad args data types? One with TimeZone and one without + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + + // test with TimeZone vs without + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeWithTimeZone); + arguments.add(attrTimeNoTimeZone); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + assertEquals("function:time-greater-than Cannot compare this ISO8601DateTime with non-time-zoned ISO8601DateTime", res.getStatus().getStatusMessage()); + assertEquals("urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:status:processing-error", res.getStatus().getStatusCode().getStatusCodeValue().stringValue()); + + + } + + @Test + public void testTime_GTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_TIME_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_TIME_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_TIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testTime_LT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_TIME_LESS_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_TIME_LESS_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_TIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testTime_LTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_TIME_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_TIME_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_TIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + + + + + /** + * Time-in-range + */ + @Test + public void testTime_in_range() { + + FunctionDefinitionTimeInRange fd = (FunctionDefinitionTimeInRange) StdFunctions.FD_TIME_IN_RANGE; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_TIME_IN_RANGE, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_TIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(3), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // arg 0 in range of others + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // below range + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // above range + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // range bad + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrTimeTommorrow); + arguments.add(attrTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // bad types + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeWithTimeZone); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeNoTimeZone); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + assertEquals("function:time-in-range Expected 3 arguments, got 2", res.getStatus().getStatusMessage()); + assertEquals("urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:status:processing-error", res.getStatus().getStatusCode().getStatusCodeValue().stringValue()); + + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeWithTimeZone); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeNoTimeZone); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + assertEquals("function:time-in-range Expected data type 'time' saw 'dateTime' at arg index 0", res.getStatus().getStatusMessage()); + assertEquals("urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:status:processing-error", res.getStatus().getStatusCode().getStatusCodeValue().stringValue()); + + } + + + + + + + /** + * DateTime + */ + + @Test + public void testDateTime_GT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATETIME_GREATER_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATETIME_GREATER_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // test bad args data types? One with TimeZone and one without + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(stringAttr1); + arguments.add(intAttr1); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + + // test with TimeZone vs without + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeWithTimeZone); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeNoTimeZone); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertFalse(res.isOk()); + assertEquals("function:dateTime-greater-than Cannot compare this ISO8601DateTime with non-time-zoned ISO8601DateTime", res.getStatus().getStatusMessage()); + assertEquals("urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:status:processing-error", res.getStatus().getStatusCode().getStatusCodeValue().stringValue()); + + + } + + @Test + public void testDateTime_GTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATETIME_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATETIME_GREATER_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testDateTime_LT() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATETIME_LESS_THAN; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATETIME_LESS_THAN, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + @Test + public void testDateTime_LTE() { + + FunctionDefinitionComparison fd = (FunctionDefinitionComparison) StdFunctions.FD_DATETIME_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL; + + // check identity and type of the thing created + assertEquals(XACML3.ID_FUNCTION_DATETIME_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL, fd.getId()); + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_DATETIME.getId(), fd.getDataTypeArgs().getId()); + + // just to be safe... If tests take too long these can probably be eliminated + assertEquals(DataTypes.DT_BOOLEAN.getId(), fd.getDataTypeId()); + assertFalse(fd.returnsBag()); + assertEquals(new Integer(2), fd.getNumArgs()); + + // first == second + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeSameDay); + ExpressionResult res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + Boolean resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first < second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeTommorrow); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertTrue(resValue); + + // first > second + arguments.clear(); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeToday); + arguments.add(attrDateTimeYesterday); + res = fd.evaluate(null, arguments); + assertTrue(res.isOk()); + resValue = (Boolean)res.getValue().getValue(); + assertFalse(resValue); + } + + + +} -- cgit 1.2.3-korg