# Introduction The AAF Reverse Proxy is a proxy microservice which intercepts incoming REST requests by, extracting the credentials from the request and authenticate/authorises with a configured security provider. It is one of two components (along with the Forward proxy) deployed as a Kubernetes sidecar to separate the responsibility of authentication and authorization away from the primary microservice, this service is responsible for controlling access to the REST URL endpoints exposed by the primary microservice, and propogating security credentials to downstream microservices. ## Features Reverse Proxy: * The service will intercept all incoming REST requests to the primary service, extract and cache the token credentials in the Forward proxy. * Invokes the authentication and authorisation providers to validate the extracted tokens, and retrieve its list of authorisations * Invokes the enforcement point filter to determine whether the incoming request URI and retrieved permissions match the list of granted URIs and permissions configured in the URI authorisation file. If authorisation is successful, forward the request to the primary service. ## Configuring the rProxy service The rProxy service is configured through property and json files that resides under the ${CONFIG_HOME} environment variable. The files have the following configurable properties: ###cadi.properties cadi_loglevel log level of the cadi filter, e.g. DEBUG, INFO cadi_keyfile location to the cadi key file cadi_truststore cadi_truststore_password aaf_url hostname and port of the server hosting the AAF service, e.g. https://aaf.osaaf.org:30247 aaf_env AAF environment type, e.g. DEV, PROD aaf_id aafadmin user, e.g. demo@people.osaaf.org aaf_password aafadmin user password encrypted with the cadi_keyfile, e.g. enc:92w4px0y_rrm265LXLpw58QnNPgDXykyA1YTrflbAKz cadi_x509_issuers colon separated list of client cert issuers ###reverse-proxy.properties transactionid.header.name This is the name of the header in incoming requests that will contain the transaction ID. X-TransactionId ###primary-service.properties primary-service.protocol http protocol of the primary service e.g. https primary-service.host location of the primary service, since this sidecar resides in the same pod of the primary service. localhost primary-service.port port of the primary service ###forward-proxy.properties forward-proxy.protocol http protocol of the fproxy service e.g. https forward-proxy.host location of the fproxy service, since this sidecar resides in the same pod of the primary service. localhost forward-proxy.port port of the fproxy service forward-proxy.cacheurl URI to the store credential cache. /credential-cache ### auth/uri-authorization.json This file is used by the ReverseProxyAuthorization filter, the configurable authorization enforcement point, and contains the list of required AAF permissions needed for the request URI. The content of the file is in JSON format. Permissions will be tested against the first matching URI. If the user doesn't have those permissions then the next matching URI will be tested until the list of URIs is exhausted. URIs will be matched in order as positioned in the configuration file. All permissions listed in the configuration file for a request URI must have been granted to the user. The current implement of side car security retrieves user permissions from AAF. AAF permissions are composed of a type, instance and action and are returned from AAF as those values separated by the pipe (|) character e.g. org.onap.osaaf.resources.access|rest|read. Both instance and/or action can be wildcarded with an asterisk (*) e.g. org.onap.osaaf.resources.access|*|read, org.onap.osaaf.resources.access|rest|* or org.onap.osaaf.resources.access|*|*. If action or instance is wildcarded then a match between granted and needed permissions is found as long as the non wildcarded parts of the permission match too. Both URIs and permissions are matched using regular expressions which are defined in the uri-authorization.json file. Regular expression tests are applied to the whole permission unless AAF wildcarding has been used in which case the permissions are split into type, instance and action and the non wildcarded parts are tested individually. Note that owing to regular expression and JSON format that backslashes need to be escaped twice. [ { "uri": "URI 1", "permissions": [ "permission 1", "permission 2", "..."] }, { "uri": "URI 2", "permissions": [ "permission 3", "permission 4", "..."] } ] e.g. [ { "uri": "\\/aai\\/v13\\/cloud-infrastructure\\/cloud-regions$", "permissions": [ "org\\.onap\\.osaaf\\.resources\\.access\\|rest\\|read" ] }, { "uri": "\\/aai\\/v13\\/cloud-infrastructure\\/cloud-regions\\/cloud-region\\/[^\\/]+[\\/][^\\/]+$*", "permissions": [ "org\\.onap\\.osaaf\\.resources\\.access|clouds|read", "org\\.onap\\.osaaf\\.auth\\.resources\\.access|tenants|read" ] }, { "uri": "\\/aai\\/v13\\/cloud-infrastructure\\/cloud-regions\\/cloud-region\\/[^\\/]+[\\/][^\\/]+\\/tenants\\/tenant/[^\\/]+\\/vservers\\/vserver\\/[^\\/]+$", "permissions": [ "org\\.onap\\.osaaf\\.auth\\.resources\\.access\\|clouds\\|read", "org\\.onap\\.osaaf\\.auth\\.resources\\.access\\|tenants\\|read", "org\\.onap\\.osaaf\\.auth\\.resources\\.access\\|vservers\\|read" ] } ] ## Using an Alternative Authorization Service Provider The current implementation of side car security relies on AAF & use of the CADI filter. In order to use an alternative authorization service provider it will be necessary to modify the Reverse Proxy side car filter chain. The first change necessary is replacement of the CADI filter. The replacing filter will be responsible for extracting the credentials from the incoming request, contacting the alternative authorization service to return the authorizations/permissions and passing the authorizations through to the ReverseProxyAuthorization filter. The ReverseProxyAuthorization filter is next in the filter chain. Currently authorizations are passed with the HttpServletRequestWrapper derived CADIWrap object. If it is desirable to not have a dependency on the CADI libraries then a new object derived from HTTPServletRequestWrapper can be used or alternatively authorizations could be passed as an attribute set on the HTTPServletRequest. If either of these two options are chosen then the ReverseProxyAuthorization filter with need altering to use the new object or to retrieve authorizations from the request attribute. Finally the auth/uri-authorization.json file will need revising to match the new format and list of permissions for the URI requests.